Well, it would have been interesting to watch that evolve, but it's not like I haven't spent a lot of time hashing it over...probably for the best. Well, if I'm going to write that novel this year, it probably is. I don't get where he is coming from a lot of the time, anyway.(Which is probably me...I didn't mean to act as though I was calling him a dumbass or anything...just having things in common doesn't mean you're on the same page, though it can give me an opener from time to time.)
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
He's coming up on a Dru-heavy set of episodes soon, so he'll have to pay attention. Isn't What's My Line right after Dark Ages?
Isn't What's My Line right after Dark Ages?
Yup.
Askye, I assume that's from the most recent season of Luther, since I am behind on it and haven;t gotten there, which means it should be spoiler fonted.
Perkins, sorry it's stuff that I was kinda remembering from the first episode and also forgetting about the spoiler policy.
Sorry!
I get that slightly naive emotion is his thing, but it seems really trivial in the realm of evil to be grossed out by disregard for consent issues, is my point. I'm not going rank pain, just to point that lots and lots of horrible things are to happen every week. It's the point of the show.
it doesn't mean that he doesn't enjoy it from a storytelling perspective. It's two totally different things.
What does it mean? That he's against rape and sexual assault?
disregard for consent issues
FWIW, a lot of the discussion around "Seeing Red" on this board centered on the presentation of rape in the show. How for many people it plays as worse on screen than murder, and makes the character irredeemable. That in the real world murder, kidnapping, torture were all worse or equally bad crimes but that rape and sexual assault affected them differently within the context of a TV show or movie.
Rape and sexual assault are much more common crimes - than kidnapping, murder and torture. That may affect how we perceive them on screen. Also, in our culture excusing rape is much more common that excusing the other crimes mentioned (though this board is blessedly free of that particular social flaw) which may also affect how on-screen rape and assault is perceived.
I know David. I was here.
I'm not going to fall into the trap of ranking evil, but I am going to firmly say that if you're grossed out by a disregard for something that didn't even happen, over a murdering demon saying "Or you could take advantage of me in my weakened state." then you've got a tough row to hoe when people actually get, you know, driven crazy, killed, raped, etc. Seriously. The demon was a woman saying it was okay to have sex with her even though she's not 100%. That's only a consent issue for us because we have meta knowledge. People with concussions are legally allowed to consent to sex in many many cases.
Mark just doesn't get Drusilla.
Anyway, the two plots at work here in "What’s My Line, Part One" are...well, I can’t say I’m totally on board with Spike’s plot? I like him as a character, but I’m still just confused by Drusilla’s characterization. As far as I understand it, she acts the way she does because of the way Angel treated her as his...sire? Is that what that means? Okay, don’t answer that yet. The point I’m trying to make is that the attempt to portray any sort of mental illness on Drusilla’s part just feels lazy. It’s not that Juliet Landau is a bad actress; I think she’s doing the best she can with the material. I just feel like the writers have given us the bare minimum of her story, and because of that, she doesn’t feel like a whole character to me. At best, she exists to irritate Spike and make him angry towards Buffy.
While I am sort of baffled at his complete misread of Drusilla, I do kind of get the criticism that her main character trait as of now is "crazy." Mostly she says a lot of things that don't make sense, which is perfectly entertaining but perhaps doesn't say a lot about her as a person? I think Juliet Landau brought a lot to the character and made her feel like there was someone behind all those bizarre lines.