The kittens were controversial?
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Cass - Jan 05, 2012 5:50:37 pm PST #8113 of 10459
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
§ ita § - Jan 05, 2012 5:52:13 pm PST #8114 of 10459
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Yeah, I'm going to have to go with Willow/Oz. I'm an Instanbulista.
§ ita § - Jan 05, 2012 5:52:29 pm PST #8115 of 10459
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The kittens were controversial?
No, the Kittens. The fan group.
I'm assuming.
DavidS - Jan 05, 2012 5:53:18 pm PST #8116 of 10459
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
DavidS - Jan 05, 2012 5:54:25 pm PST #8117 of 10459
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I'm assuming.
Correct. Though I'm sure people objected to kittens as poker chips at demon parties.
Cass - Jan 05, 2012 5:57:12 pm PST #8118 of 10459
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
No, the Kittens. The fan group.
Ah. So much clearer.
Because kittens as gambling currency was adorable.
§ ita § - Jan 05, 2012 5:57:13 pm PST #8119 of 10459
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It squicked sarameg, I remember.
Connie Neil - Jan 05, 2012 5:59:11 pm PST #8120 of 10459
brillig
I'ma go with Spike/Xander. Still.
I'ma love the Teppy. I'm still writing them, after all.
Atropa - Jan 05, 2012 6:20:17 pm PST #8121 of 10459
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.
And I really don't ship Dru with anyone other than Miss Edith at best.
No no no. Miss Edith is her treasured confidant, but they're not in a *relationship*.
... I'm doing that thing again where I am maybe over-identifying with a crazy person who talks to toys, aren't I? Clovis and I will be right over here.
(Dru+Spike=foreveah!11!)
§ ita § - Jan 05, 2012 6:43:34 pm PST #8122 of 10459
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Look, Jilli, some people are shagging their toy confidantes. That does not have to reflect on all the platonic toy relationships out there in any way.