"Don't say no to drugs, say 'no, thank you'" (I heard they offered that to Benicio Del Toro anyway.) but, seriously, and in a less in-jokey way, after reading the article, I'd be concerned. Because EW isn't like zap2it or AICN or someplace that mostly serves, well, us, right? Regular casual moviegoers read EW, and we don't know how many of them reacted to this film idea like an h1n1 alert. You know?
William ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Awww, baby Woodside-Brooks. Maybe they can call the baby "Peaceful" or "Babbling".
We watched it in the hotel lobby on Sunday!
That is fantastic. Fun, fun.
We watched it in the hotel lobby on Sunday!
There was much rejoicing. If we had minstrels we'd have eaten them.
I know not of this "hotel lobby" of which you speak and refuse to believe that such a thing exists.
Awesomecakes!
ignores rumor of hotel lobby watching
I've not read Twilight (although a friend recently bought me the book), nor seen the movie, and yet, somehow, I feel confident that I like this ending better. I especially like all the copyright talk both on the remix and on the website. It would have been fun to see more specific stuff about the creator's fair use analysis. It does seem like a plausible fair use analysis could be made, although I'm sure some would argue otherwise.
It just so happens that two Buffistas are cruising right to my town next month, so I may relent and actually admit to the possible existence of said "hotel lobby". I may even be able to keep myself from saying, "neener, neener!"
Oops. I guess not.