Yeah, Trevor does good work.
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Yeah, the Daily Show post was a good one. It's amazing to me that the complainers are so un-self-aware, that they can't see they are perpetuating the exact stereotypes they're fighting against (i.e. humorless self-importance).
Sunnydale 10 Year Reunion, Where Are They Now? [link]
This one needs to be in spoiler font - "Now a Broadway star, Michael is our second-most-famous student, after reality-show star Harmony Kendall. (Hi, Harm!)"
I love that they are following comics continuity.
I love that they are following comics continuity.
The guy who wrote that, Clinton McClung, is an acquaintance and is definitely a HUGE Buffy fan.
Joss appeared at a university the other night and spoke about the Buffy movie. He said, essentially, when he first sold the script, he sold the full movie rights but kept the TV rights (nobody protested it because who would make a TV series called 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer'?). He thinks he has no say in it, because the rights are elsewhere. And, well, he's probably right.
So, I guess it's all up to Billy Walsh, uh, Ms. Kuzui...sorry, been making that mistake a lot lately...my bad. I know...they should get Kevin Smith and make "Chasing Buffy". (I might actually watch that.)
A UK publisher is going to do a series of Angel/Buffy magazines each focusing on a specific character that come with a painted lead figurine of that character. For more info check out here.
"Don't say no to drugs, say 'no, thank you'" (I heard they offered that to Benicio Del Toro anyway.) but, seriously, and in a less in-jokey way, after reading the article, I'd be concerned. Because EW isn't like zap2it or AICN or someplace that mostly serves, well, us, right? Regular casual moviegoers read EW, and we don't know how many of them reacted to this film idea like an h1n1 alert. You know?