Yes, it's nice that your psychiatrist tells your husband about your sessions and calls you a child @@
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Hmm, it doesn't read to me that way -- my reading of that whole paragraph is that he's using the "a lot of women" strawman (straw-people) to express what he's actually asserting as his opinion -- that he believes women (and men) were better off with those defined gender roles.
Hmm, it doesn't read to me that way -- my reading of that whole paragraph is that he's using the "a lot of women" strawman (straw-people) to express what he's actually asserting as his opinion -- that he believes women (and men) were better off with those defined gender roles.
me too. But I fully admit to a bias against him.
By the end of the paragraph, he's clearly asserting it as his own opinion.
And I'll agree with him that gender roles were more clearly defined at that time. But I can't agree that it was a good thing. A lot of people don't fit their preassigned roles.
I keep hoping that that comment was a failed attempt at humor on VK's part, but he really does sound like an asshat throughout the interview.
Not to mention that, ok, he wasn't a fan of Buffy and didn't know the backstory when he came on as Connor. Fair enough.
But when you're an unknown coming in to an established series, I'd doubt you should expect much leverage with the script writers. And after a while, you don't have much room to complain that you don't understand the back story.
i've heard insider things about VK that made me form the opinion that he's an asshat. that interview just solidified it.
I dunno, he doesn't sound like an asshole to me. His criticisms of Connor seem a fairly honest self-assessment, he seems more critical of his own actions/acting than anything else.
I'm with Burrell on this.
If VK thinks that gender roles in 1960 are something to be nostalgic about, I say he's an asshat. It really doesn't matter what he thinks about the Whedonverse.
But also what Fred Pete said. The kid thinks he's going to have input into a character in a 'verse that he didn't bother to research?