Yeah... That went well.

Mal ,'Trash'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


Anne W. - Dec 28, 2005 2:43:27 am PST #2639 of 10459
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

t OT bit

Matt, what's your tag line from? It cracks me up every time I see it.

t /OT bit

Nilly, what you posted there has me thinking. In a way, Angel (and the others) being at W&H is almost like an inverse of Angel's own situation. Angel is someone on the side of good who is constantly having to fight against the darkness inside him and trying to bend it to his will. At W&H, he and the others are a bit of goodness inside an entity that is generally evil and that wants to bend them to its will and ways. Of course, things aren't quite so neatly dualistic as all that, but by being at W&H, it does put Angel neatly between a rock and a hard place when it comes to being pulled towards the darkness.


DavidS - Dec 28, 2005 7:34:12 am PST #2640 of 10459
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I think Angel was good with the decision to join W&H, because I think he'd willingly trade all the MoG's lives for one happy Connor life. Which is what he did.

Good job, Champion.


Matt the Bruins fan - Dec 28, 2005 8:06:03 am PST #2641 of 10459
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Of course, he also effectively traded Fred's immortal soul for that happy life, which he might have balked at had he known in advance that was a possible consequence.

Matt, what's your tag line from? It cracks me up every time I see it.

It's a quote from Sgt. Kabukiman, NYPD.


Strega - Dec 28, 2005 11:54:14 am PST #2642 of 10459

I think he'd willingly trade all the MoG's lives for one happy Connor life. Which is what he did.

Hey now, Lorne survived.

It's hard for me to evaluate because, as I think we've discussed before, the deal Angel took in "Home" was different from the deal they turned out to have in season 5. But either way, he was the most adamant from the start that it was a bad idea, and I don't think his opinion about the badness changed. So I don't think he went in thinking, "We'll be a fifth column and bring the organization down from within, mwah ha ha!" He took a soul-sucking job because it was the only way to provide for his kid.

Also, regarding his decision at the end of the series. To me, it looks like trying to prove the "if nothing that you do matters, all that matters is what you do" theme,

Which decision do you mean? They succeeded in destroying the Circle, and that seemed like more than a symbolic victory. What happened in the alley was a consequence of winning.


DavidS - Dec 28, 2005 12:26:51 pm PST #2643 of 10459
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Hey now, Lorne survived.

Well, that's true. But Lorne wasn't happy about it.

He took a soul-sucking job because it was the only way to provide for his kid.

And that's a noble thing to do, right? Right?


P.M. Marc - Dec 28, 2005 12:46:52 pm PST #2644 of 10459
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

And that's a noble thing to do, right? Right?

Darn tootin'.


Strega - Dec 28, 2005 1:09:10 pm PST #2645 of 10459

Absolutely.


sumi - Dec 28, 2005 7:53:13 pm PST #2646 of 10459
Art Crawl!!!

For some reason, TNT is having an overnight Angel marathon tonight -- it starts at Midnight. (In five minutes!)


Topic!Cindy - Dec 29, 2005 12:41:30 am PST #2647 of 10459
What is even happening?

He took a soul-sucking job because it was the only way to provide for his kid.
And that's a noble thing to do, right? Right?
Mmm. I don't know. It was all he could do, because of who he is. If Angel had done otherwise, I would have felt like I was watching a different show.

This is where the dread C word comes in handy. Angel isn't a hero--never was. He got involved in fighting demons, because he was in love with Buffy, and Buffy (a hero, not generally a champion) fought demons. He stayed involved (see I Will Remember You) not to save the world, but because if he stayed human, Buffy would have died.

In Home, he had to be him, or something. He had to save the person he loved. The other people he saved, he saved because they needed him to save him. His is less of a crusade than the slayer's life.


Nilly - Dec 29, 2005 2:58:54 am PST #2648 of 10459
Swouncing

He took a soul-sucking job because it was the only way to provide for his kid.

Oh, I guess I wasn't clear. That's exactly how I see it, too.

I just thought, like Anne pointed out, that from a different way of looking at things, it's not surprising that the show, based on a vampire using his vampire's strengths to fight evil, has taken that step, as well.

Which decision do you mean?

To even try to fight the cirlce, which, just like you pointed out, had worked.

They succeeded in destroying the Circle, and that seemed like more than a symbolic victory. What happened in the alley was a consequence of winning.

Yup. And charging that is also a desicion, in and of itself.

Angel isn't a hero--never was.

I'm afraid I'm completely ignorant in the definitions of things. What makes somebody a hero?