I never noticed that before. Creepy.

AFN was running an interview with SMG today. I learned two things: the Burger King ads with the little girl saying that BK had better burgers than McDonald's...the ones McDonald's sued BK over? That girl was SMG. And they sued her too.

I also learned that she and Seth Green made a Duncan Hines commercial together when they were about 8 years old.

People talk about SMG for not commenting on the DVDs or whatever, but I can't really blame her. The show is over for her, why keep reliving it? She did plenty of publicity for the show during its run.

I watched the "bonus DVD" for the box set last night. Legions of eh. However, I suspect that people who have not spend hours of their workday for the last 10 years discussing Buffy might find some of the information interesting or enlightening.

IDW solicitations for March include Angel Scriptbooks:

ANGEL SCRIPTBOOK #1

Joss Whedon (w); Jeff Johnson (a & c)

Presenting monthly illustrated scriptbooks based on the very best Angel episodes pulled from its five-season run. Each specially priced 48-page scriptbook will feature the entire shooting script and full-page and spot illustrations from the episode by artist Jeff Johnson. Up first, the very first episode of Angel, “City Of,” scripted by series creator Joss Whedon.

$3.99 B&W 48 pages

There is a picture on the top of the page of the link. . . I cut and pasted the description in it's entirety. There is a description of the upcoming Angel comic that is somewhat spoilery.

So, say that somebody was asked to participate in some sort of debating [Edit: in a local small science-fiction convention] regarding "Angel in the 5th season: a calculated hero or a desperate man who lost his way?".

And say that this somebody can't find the time to threadsuck all of the S5 threads and comb them for opinions, but still wonders what the clever Buffistas may be thinking, what would your opinion on the subject be, and why.

Do you think anybody would still have the energy to re-hash these subjects? And what would you have to say about it?

Thanks!

Others are far wiser than me on such topics Nilly, but I'm going to go with "calculated hero, aware of the futility of his otherwise noble, if insensitive actions."

Angels arc in season 5 pinged me as very Pattonesque. Certainly well meaning but self indulgent and sometimes mark-missing.

I think he was purposeful. His big mistake, IMO, was to forget the agency of the other characters, and it was when that went badly (c.f. Wesley in Origin) that he really seemed to start flailing, in a broody way.

I have trouble using the word "calculated" to describe Angel. "Desperate" doesn't work for me too well, either. Maybe I don't understand the question, or maybe I'm just too fussy about words.

A lot of S5 is certainly about Angel feeling like he's lost his identity and his purpose. As far as I'm concerned, that's the main arc for the season, even if it's not handled so well. At the end I guess he's calculated, in that he actually has a goal again. So... either neither one is right, or both are, depending. (I'm helpful!)

For me it hinges on Angel's motivation for accepting the deal -- it seems he did it for Connor, and then tried to make it work out. Calculated would have had him planning (coldly) how to save the world from W&H up front, but I think he took the deal out of desperation, and tried to make the best of it.

The plan, good or no, came second.

I wouldn't describe Angel in S5 as "calculated," although "calculating," sure. {aside, Angelus is also calculating and that, IMO, is what makes him more scary than almost any other vampire}. And not exactly desperate, although desperation--as ita says--got him into the S5 situation. It really is a return to whatever season it was when Angel realized that you can't defeat evil, you can only fight it. He relearns that lesson and channels his frustration into a clever way to do maximal damage. Actually, I'm not sure I've ever understood quite what was going on there at the end, but it was epic. Dragons.