Monty: Whaddya mean she ain't my wife? Mal: She ain't your wife... cause she's married to me.

'Trash'


The Great Write Way, Chapter Two: Twice upon a time...  

A place for Buffistas to discuss, beta and otherwise deal and dish on their non-fan fiction projects.


deborah grabien - Mar 04, 2005 11:17:13 pm PST #378 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Susan, that's a nice piece. Of course, I'm biased, since Ringan can see the Tor from the curve at the end of his bit of road, and in the first book, on Jane's first visit to Lumbe's Cottage, she gets stuck circling the Tor in the mud.

Homesick for England. Doesn't happen that often these days.


Susan W. - Mar 05, 2005 1:06:19 pm PST #379 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

Today my RWA chapter did a workshop on critiquing and asked for guinea pigs to volunteer to bring in our first seven pages. Being somewhat of a verbal exhibitionist, I was all, "Me! Me! Me!"

Of course when I got there my hands were shaking. What if they ripped it to shreds, politely or otherwise? Sure I go to a critique group every Monday night and have beta readers, intermittent and regular, but I realized once I got there that having your work read aloud to twenty people, some of whom you know well, others NSM, and several of whom are multi-published, is a whole 'nother story.

It worked out fine, though. Got a lot of praise for my scene-setting skills--people saying they could picture it vividly, could taste the road dust, etc. Which made me feel very good, given that it wasn't all that long ago that my critique group would complain week in and week out about not being able to see my scenes. Got conflicting feedback on how I manage backstory--I had to laugh when I looked at the written comments and saw "too much backstory" and "great job working in the backstory" on back-to-back copies! Jack continues to draw near-universal reader love, and I got some good suggestion on how to make Anna more sympathetic and vivid from the start.

Oh, and a couple of the published authors told me I was just so close--a little tweaking here, a little polishing there, and I should have something saleable on my hands. That felt good.


Susan W. - Mar 05, 2005 1:10:00 pm PST #380 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

And Deb, I'm really glad you liked the article--makes me feel like I must've managed to capture the atmosphere of the place, and that was my main goal, beyond all the practical "here's what to see" stuff.


deborah grabien - Mar 07, 2005 7:06:04 am PST #381 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Monday? New topic?


Steph L. - Mar 07, 2005 7:19:04 am PST #382 of 10001
the hardest to learn / was the least complicated

Ooof. Let me think about it over lunch.


deborah grabien - Mar 07, 2005 7:41:06 am PST #383 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

What is this "lunch" thing of which I have heard you speak?

Oh - right. The meal I keep forgetting to eat, along with breakfast...


Steph L. - Mar 07, 2005 9:07:06 am PST #384 of 10001
the hardest to learn / was the least complicated

Okay. Have lunched.

Challenge #47 (yellow) is now closed.

Challenge #48 is: container(s)/holding (or some variation on "hold").

Go to it!


Amy - Mar 07, 2005 12:51:25 pm PST #385 of 10001
Because books.

It's only a silly question if you don't ask, right?

Are "container" and a form of "hold" both supposed to be in the drabble, or does the slash mean either or?


§ ita § - Mar 07, 2005 12:55:47 pm PST #386 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

does the slash mean either or?

The slash means that the container(s) and the holding are having non-canon relations.


Steph L. - Mar 07, 2005 1:12:59 pm PST #387 of 10001
the hardest to learn / was the least complicated

OTP, baby!

Nah, it was just meant to indicate a general sense of "the topic can be about holding, or the [thing] that holds, where [thing] = 'container,' but not necessarily a literal Tupperware container."

If that makes sense.