So clearly a good patriotic Briton would remove Andrew Parker-Bowles from the scene.
Buffy: Synchronized slaying. Faith: New Olympic category?
'Conversations with Dead People'
Spike's Bitches 22: You've got Angel breath
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Betsy HP - Feb 10, 2005 11:23:16 am PST #453 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
Stephanie - Feb 10, 2005 11:24:50 am PST #454 of 10001
Trust my rage
So the sin isn't the divorce, but the remarriage? I guess I knew that, but it's interesting to me that Diana's death somehow makes it okay for Charles to marry his longtime girlfriend. OTOH, I guess that sounds just like a historical novel.
brenda m - Feb 10, 2005 11:30:00 am PST #455 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
The divorce is just not recognized. In the eyes of the church, no such thing, never happened. So Camilla is still married, as was Charles up until Diana died. There's a fairly solid logic to it, even if it does produce some odd situations.
Aims - Feb 10, 2005 11:31:05 am PST #456 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Brenda!! You are a corset dealer. You gave me a taste and now I must have more corsetry.
Connie Neil - Feb 10, 2005 11:34:01 am PST #457 of 10001
brillig
Was just reading The Guardian's stories. Charles is technically a widower, so he's clear.
Personally, I've always thought Camilla was better looking than Diana, who had this big-eyed, "If I keep smiling, maybe they won't hurt me" look to her.
Betsy HP - Feb 10, 2005 11:34:50 am PST #458 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
I guess I knew that, but it's interesting to me that Diana's death somehow makes it okay for Charles to marry his longtime girlfriend.
On the contrary, Charles had an elaborate P.R. "See, my girlfriend's not so bad" campaign going that was thwarted when Diana died, causing a wave of anti-Camilla feeling. So Diana's death probably set back the marriage by several years.
Nowadays, Britons think "Eh, whatever", so Charles won't be endangering the Throne by marrying his popsy.
-t - Feb 10, 2005 11:37:36 am PST #459 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Nowadays, Britons think "Eh, whatever"
Americans, otoh, bizarrely fascinated.
P.M. Marc - Feb 10, 2005 11:40:01 am PST #460 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
On the contrary, Charles had an elaborate P.R. "See, my girlfriend's not so bad" campaign going that was thwarted when Diana died, causing a wave of anti-Camilla feeling.
Oddly, I saw some of that today. I admit to having been baffled.
But then, Diana didn't like horses, so I always thought she was a bit of a twit, and Charles a fool for marrying her.
Betsy HP - Feb 10, 2005 11:40:45 am PST #461 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
Of course. We don't have kings and queens, so we have to worship Hollywood stars instead.
We're just as fascinated with Brad and Jennifer. (As a collective, that is; individually, many of us have never forgiven Brad for the time he bit our sister's moose.)
Topic!Cindy - Feb 10, 2005 11:41:08 am PST #462 of 10001
What is even happening?
The divorce is just not recognized. In the eyes of the church, no such thing, never happened. So Camilla is still married, as was Charles up until Diana died. There's a fairly solid logic to it, even if it does produce some odd situations.
My guess is as many of us as not are used to hearing, "What God has joined together, let no man put asunder," in the wedding liturgy.