Mal: Does.. um.. does this seem kind of tight? Kaylee: Shows off your backside.

'Shindig'


Spike's Bitches 22: You've got Angel breath  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Betsy HP - Feb 10, 2005 11:40:45 am PST #461 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

Of course. We don't have kings and queens, so we have to worship Hollywood stars instead.

We're just as fascinated with Brad and Jennifer. (As a collective, that is; individually, many of us have never forgiven Brad for the time he bit our sister's moose.)


Topic!Cindy - Feb 10, 2005 11:41:08 am PST #462 of 10001
What is even happening?

The divorce is just not recognized. In the eyes of the church, no such thing, never happened. So Camilla is still married, as was Charles up until Diana died. There's a fairly solid logic to it, even if it does produce some odd situations.

My guess is as many of us as not are used to hearing, "What God has joined together, let no man put asunder," in the wedding liturgy.


Betsy HP - Feb 10, 2005 11:42:25 am PST #463 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

My guess is as many of us as not are used to hearing, "What God has joined together, let no man put asunder," in the wedding liturgy.

Actually, I hear that routinely, and I've heard it in weddings that then broke up.

I don't find the concept of an indissoluble marriage at all odd. What I find strange is the concept of a semi-soluble marriage.


tommyrot - Feb 10, 2005 11:45:42 am PST #464 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

What I find strange is the concept of a semi-soluble marriage.

Marriages that are soluble at higher temperatures, but at lower temperatures they precipitate?


brenda m - Feb 10, 2005 11:47:45 am PST #465 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Brenda!! You are a corset dealer.

Whoot! Are there pictures?


Cashmere - Feb 10, 2005 12:02:36 pm PST #466 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

This babysitting thing is a pain in the ass. I've called four people. Our high school girl can't because she has ski club. Our college girl can't because she's already booked. Two friends of mine already have plans.

Looks like O is coming out to the birthday dinner with us. I blame the party planner. He didn't send us the invite until Tuesday. Not enough time for me to get a sitter.


P.M. Marc - Feb 10, 2005 12:09:56 pm PST #467 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Hey, hivemind--how long does it normally take to get your glucose tol test results back?


Topic!Cindy - Feb 10, 2005 12:28:08 pm PST #468 of 10001
What is even happening?

Actually, I hear that routinely,

(That's what I meant--I think my wording was awkward)

and I've heard it in weddings that then broke up.
Yes. I was just agreeing with brenda about the consistency of the policy, where the divorce just doesn't exist in the eyes of the Anglican church.

I don't find the concept of an indissoluble marriage at all odd. What I find strange is the concept of a semi-soluble marriage.

Me, too.

edited because brenda tried to trick me into thinking that she was beth.


vw bug - Feb 10, 2005 12:30:11 pm PST #469 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Cindy, I got it. Thank you so much!


Beverly - Feb 10, 2005 12:57:25 pm PST #470 of 10001
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

Something that may be de-pressurizing the Chuck and Camilla marriage is the highly unlikely possibility that they'll have children together. What would have, in previous reigns, made public recognition of their union, and him keeping his head-of-the-line status impossible would be the possibility that any child of their union could challenge rightful-born heirs for the throne.