cereal...
vw, survey insent. Let me know if you don't get it.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
cereal...
vw, survey insent. Let me know if you don't get it.
Isn't Camilla's ex-husband now dead, too? If so, why can't she be Queen consort. If not, never mind.
Nope. He's still alive and kicking.
And remarried himself.
That answers that. Thanks, you two. For some reason, I thought he was dead, too. Maybe at one time, I just figured Charles and Camilla were waiting for him to kick, before marrying.
I still don't understand why they can't get married in the Church, but they can have a formal blessing for their marriage in the Church.
We sort-of disapprove, but oh, heck, go ahead you, crazy kids?
I still don't understand why they can't get married in the Church, but they can have a formal blessing for their marriage in the Church.
We sort-of disapprove, but oh, heck, go ahead you, crazy kids?
I think that pretty much sums it up. Marriage-Lite.
So is it her divorce that's keeping them from getting married in teh church or his? Was he actually divorced? I think so, but I can't remember.
His divorce, I believe, is no longer relevant. Hers is.
So clearly a good patriotic Briton would remove Andrew Parker-Bowles from the scene.
So the sin isn't the divorce, but the remarriage? I guess I knew that, but it's interesting to me that Diana's death somehow makes it okay for Charles to marry his longtime girlfriend. OTOH, I guess that sounds just like a historical novel.