Nonono, Hec, it's not you, dear heart. It's the whole discussion, and me being in a bad bad headspace right now.

Sorry to be all wet-blankety, everyone. I will defend Paul some other day, but right now I'm just feeling kicked in the teeth by life in general. For no very good reason, just a lot of selfish wallowing in pity for other peoples' unhappiness, so I don't need any punctuation. I just feel all surly and prickly and full of wrong wordiness, so I'm'a go soak my head and resurface later.

I will be vibing ecumeical vibes in the direction of Betsy's rotator cuff, though.

No. I have outrage enough for...well, The Four Corners area. But also for many institutions.

Worldwide and historically, well, nobody's ever had more money or more power than the Catholic Church. It's nobody's fault but their own if they don't have a history of using either one terribly well.

Please point me to an organization of any sort that's been around for 2,000 years -- heck, even 1,000 or 500-- that has used power and money particularly well. I certainly can't think of one.

How many other organizations have been around for 1000 years?

How many other organizations have been around for 1000 years?

The Masons!

(kidding. I have no idea.)

Here's a better one of my niece. Big cheesy grin:

[link]

She's adorable. (bias? what's bias?)

Please point me to an organization of any sort that's been around for 2,000 years -- heck, even 1,000 or 500-- that has used power and money particularly well. I certainly can't think of one.

The thing is, though, that it is reasonable to hold an organization to a higher standard when it claims to speak for God. The Hudson Bay Company, not so much.

How many other organizations have been around for 1000 years?

Mostly just countries -- England, China, Japan. Greece and Italy, both with major changes between then and now. Ethiopia, IIRC. Also the Jewish and Muslim religions, only Judaism hasn't had power (which , okay, the fault of Catholics) most of that time.

My point is, most of history is bloody and fairly shameful.

it is reasonable to hold an organization to a higher standard when it claims to speak for God.

How many countries have had kings who clamed to be the direct descendents of some god or other, or in personal communication with him?

My point is, most of history is bloody and fairly shameful.

See Rick's point, re: claiming moral authority.

I'm sorry you're feeling that way, JZ, and that we may be adding to it. FWIW, I'd be very interested in hearing more from you and Teppy on Paul at some point in the future.