I am off to pick up teacup boyfriend at work, and then we are off to an artist lecture of some sort. Have a good night everyone.
Spike's Bitches 22: You've got Angel breath
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I saw someone reading Mere Christianity on the bus this morning. Weird. But I had a violently negative response to it myself.
I'm approved!
Yay!!!
Approved for what?
Yay, Lilty!
That's tough, Gud. I hope y'all can overcome your differences. I'm not familiar with the books you've mentioned.
"Mere Christianity" pisses me off, and I try to be a Christian.
The first and to some extent the second part of it (I'm not finished with the third part yet) seem to be a persuasive argument where you build your agrument and getting the reader to accept one point after another that build on each other. The problem is that I don't think most of his points are complete. In a lot of places he's like it's either A or B, and I'm thinking what about C, D, and E that he didn't mention.
Good for you Lilty, whatever you're approved of. If it helps, I approve of you.
In a lot of places he's like it's either A or B, and I'm thinking what about C, D, and E that he didn't mention.
Yip. For instance, "Lunatic, Liar, or Lord" doesn't consider the cases that he was a wise man who was insane on one subject but perfectly rational otherwise, or that he was a wise man whose sayings were heavily edited by his followers.
It is betray by body day. Glucose levels are higher than I am comfortable. and today - i have a med tech come look at me for insurance purposes. and my bp was very, very high. Like - there is no way my doctor would ignore it if it was that high. so where did this monsterous number come from?
happily - my idea of comfort food has moved to the fruit and chese as oppsed to the twinkie side of life.
The so-called trilemma, "Lunatic, Liar, or Lord"? doesn't hold up to logical examination.
The FAC was very big on Lord, Liar, Lunatic? as a means of proving that Jesus was, in fact, who he claimed to be. It always seemed logical to me, BUT I admit that, in the time since I left the FAC, I've never sat down to look at its logic or lack thereof.
Hmm. I like Mere Christianity, but it's been years since I've read it, so I can't really speak to how well the arguments would hang together for me now, post-major-faith-crisis. Screwtape Letters is my most frequently re-read Lewis, even beating out Narnia. Oh, and some of the essays. I like "The Weight of Glory" and "Learning in War-Time."