This one is 18 inches high. how high did it need to be, ita?
Oh my god how much do I need that? Perfectly matches my couch.
But bad time to be spending that much money on furnitury things. Dang.
Don't worry, I'm not gonna start any sword fights. I'm over that phase.
Mal ,'War Stories'
Natter 32 Flavors and Then Some
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
brenda m - Jan 26, 2005 6:34:23 am PST #783 of 10002
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
§ ita § - Jan 26, 2005 6:35:54 am PST #784 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Matt, those stools are counter height, and I need table height. I'm looking to use them as dining room seats. Benches for dining tables seem to be a little in vogue, but my table only seats one to a side. I'm looking for something around 21 inches.
Kat -- that Ghanaian one is interesting -- I need to eyeball the colour. Except it doesn't look like it's in stores yet. You linked to the same stool twice in the rest of the post, though.
Allyson, I wish you the best of ease getting into work. Shame it's not the right time for an adventure.
Kat - Jan 26, 2005 6:41:46 am PST #785 of 10002
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
so, ita, you didn't see the white topped/dark spindly legged one?
Allyson, if you need me, i'm cellphoneable.
§ ita § - Jan 26, 2005 6:43:56 am PST #786 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Right, that's the one that wasn't linked to.
Interesting, though. I'm of two minds about the black, but it's definitely the closest thing that's not an elephant. Or camel.
amych - Jan 26, 2005 7:01:46 am PST #787 of 10002
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Laura - Jan 26, 2005 7:13:06 am PST #788 of 10002
Our wings are not tired.
Safe travel Allyson.
eta: Good to see you not incarcerated tommyrot.
Laura - Jan 26, 2005 7:27:53 am PST #789 of 10002
Our wings are not tired.
Looks like the vote for Condi Rice was 85/13. Don't know who the 13 were, but she set a record.
Although Rice was assured of confirmation, she got the most "no" votes since World War II. Seven senators voted against Henry Kissinger and six each against Dean Acheson and Alexander Haig.
Hmm, I think this number may reflect a new level of evil
tommyrot - Jan 26, 2005 7:30:51 am PST #790 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Good to see you not incarcerated tommyrot.
Thanks. I am still out roaming the streets (but not driving).
Re: Condi - Yet another example of an incompetent but loyal administration official being rewarded, while the competent ones who don't blidly parrot W's lines are attacked....
amych - Jan 26, 2005 7:31:01 am PST #791 of 10002
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Jeez. Just one more, and she would've been twice as evil as Kissinger.
Nutty - Jan 26, 2005 7:34:06 am PST #792 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
I think Kissinger out-evils all comers. Part of his evil mystique is that he could fool so many people into thinking he was "smart" rather than evil. I think people confused him with Zbigniew Bryzynski.
Whereas, anybody who watched Condi Rice testify before the 9/11 Commission can tell you she's an obvious, pathetic prevaricator. Anybody who brings up the frelling Lusitania to justify her own cluelessness needs to be whipped naked with lasagna noodles.