What Steph said. I understand numbers are symbols, because letters are words are arbitrary agreed-upon signifiers, too.
Spike's Bitches 21 Gunn Salute
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
but what does the trad quotes>
What are you trying to ask here? It may not be coming out.
Isn't it more that *numbers* are constant -- 2 apples will always be 2 apples and not twice as many, not ever -- but that the *symbols* used to describe them are arbitrary? The 2, the 4, the i?
Yeah, that's what I think, but I think there are some people who believe even that part's not true.
Basically. how do you do trad quotes? Not italics.
Basically. how do you do trad quotes?
You mean like what I just did to your statement? You use the right caret, >, followed by your quoted material. I think that's what ita described. Or are "trad quotes" something I don't know?
So (doohickey i doohickey) does italics, but what does the trad quotes> I've never been able to figure that one out.
If I type this:
My cat is
i so
annoying...
It gets translated into:
My cat is <i>so</i> annoying...
and displays like:
My cat is so annoying...
Traditional quoting is more complicated. It means that this:
>2 apples will always be 2 apples
translates to the following HTML:
<blockquote><tt>2 apples will always be 2 apples</tt></blockquote>
and displays like:
2 apples will always be 2 apples
You put the > before what you want quoted.
GUaranteed to be a x-post.
Like this?
Did it! Yeah, team me!
Thanks, guys.
Ta da!
Isn't it more that *numbers* are constant -- 2 apples will always be 2 apples and not twice as many, not ever -- but that the *symbols* used to describe them are arbitrary? The 2, the 4, the i?
Well, define 2. Not the symbol, but the concept it's signifying. There's nothing physical you can point to and say, "That's a 2." You can do math as just a symbolic way of describing the physical world -- 2 is the concept of one object plus another of the same object -- but that gets pretty limited pretty quickly. There gets to be a point where you're using the numbers to represent pure concepts that can't be represented physically.
It's all here, in the link above the posting box.