Ok. Looking at the bank account right now, I can't go to either. However, I just started the new job- so maybe I can sock away in the months after catching up on bills. Now, I've always wanted to go to San Francisco and am horribly jealous that one of my friends is there right now, but I'd like Seattle plenty- plus if finances still aren't great, I have a cousin to stay with, so I could decide to go even after the beds are all taken.

Someone tell me how/if I should vote.

Oh, you should deffinately vote Seattle.

What? Did she say an un-BIASED opinion?

Heather, I think you can reasonably go ahead and vote.

I need a check box for can't go to either, but might be able to later and would prefer San Francisco, but Seattle would be more doable.

t remembers the previous vote wording discussion

No. No I don't.

I'd factor that in on your vote, whether with ability (I voted "can" for both, as location won't impact whether or not I can attend, and it's up in the air, for example) or preference.

t shrugs

I voted for Fresno.

It wasn't easy, but hey, it's what my heart said to do.

Damn. That's talent.

I've been told I have talent.

Seems like an odd one to have though.

Yeah, that's a pretty odd talent.

I think ND should get a t-shirt that says "I voted for Fresno just to watch a man die". Or is that Reno? Maybe you should change your vote.