if you vote "can't" on one city, wouldn't you vote "strong preference" on the other?
Have you met people? It'd need to be in the rules -- and even then, I'd enforce it in the tallying, if not the software.
I'm not evil again. Why does everyone think that?
Angel ,'Sleeper'
F2F 3: Who's Bringing the Guacamole?
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 12:46:20 pm PDT #4641 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 12:47:37 pm PDT #4642 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Have you met people?
Do you have an illogic-proof method, then?
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 12:47:50 pm PDT #4643 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
ita, yes.
Atropa - Aug 25, 2005 12:48:48 pm PDT #4644 of 10001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.
I think more can attend is more important than more really love the city, both from a most Buffistas perspective and a better shot of meeting our block requirements perspective.
Plei said what I was thinking.
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 12:52:54 pm PDT #4645 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
Gah. Can't keep up. ita, that was directed at Vortex.
billytea - Aug 25, 2005 12:54:46 pm PDT #4646 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
I'm thinking, since the reasoning behind the information we want is two-stage, maybe the question should still be a two-parter, e.g.
1. Where can you attend? (Options: Seattle yes/no, SF yes/no)
2. Where do you prefer? (Seattle, SF, no preference between them)
Hil R. - Aug 25, 2005 12:56:11 pm PDT #4647 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
I agree with billytea's two-part question. It gets us the required information clearly, without having to sort through too many layers.
JenP - Aug 25, 2005 1:19:02 pm PDT #4648 of 10001
There are two important totals: Who wants a given city, and who can go to a given city. The latter should be the priority -- correct? But the former will be considered.
This is how I feel about it.
bt's suggestion would get that info. out, yes?
Matt the Bruins fan - Aug 25, 2005 2:39:08 pm PDT #4649 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
is the first deciding factor which city people CANT attend? that seems a bit negative to me.
Think of it as the deciding factor being which city would have the largest number of potential attendees.
NoiseDesign - Aug 25, 2005 2:40:46 pm PDT #4650 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
Are we assuming that if someone can't attend in one city then they will definitely attend in the other? That's a pretty large leap.