Stop! You're making my head hurt, girl.
My vote will be easy. I adore both cities and have no preference for one over the other. Whether I actually can ATTEND will be determined much closer to the actual dates.
Sex with robots is more common than most people think.
Spike ,'Lineage'
F2F 3: Who's Bringing the Guacamole?
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
Maria - Aug 25, 2005 12:29:52 pm PDT #4620 of 10001
Not so nice is that I'm about to ruin a Friday morning for a bunch of people because of a series of unfortunate events and an upset foreign government. - shrift
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 12:30:57 pm PDT #4621 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
I'm inclined to want something like:
0 = can't attend
1 = would attend (no preference)
2 = would LOVE to attend (strong preference)
City with the most points wins. It's simple, and takes both preference and ability into account.
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 12:31:19 pm PDT #4622 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
There are two important totals: Who wants a given city, and who can go to a given city. The latter should be the priority -- correct? But the former will be considered.
Vortex - Aug 25, 2005 12:32:05 pm PDT #4623 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
oh, that's good too. Of course, it's less complicated, and I'm not sure if that's a violation of Buffista principles, but okay.
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 12:33:20 pm PDT #4624 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Well, if it would help I could also add the option to choose:
Q = likes puppies
@ = hates cilantro
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 12:33:24 pm PDT #4625 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It's simple, and takes both preference and ability into account.
But .. two people loving to attend and two not being able to is equivalent to four being able to attend, and trumps three being able to attend and one not. Is that an intended effect?
Sean K - Aug 25, 2005 12:34:13 pm PDT #4626 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Sean, I don't understand what you're asking.
I think I don't either.
Nicole - Aug 25, 2005 12:34:26 pm PDT #4627 of 10001
I'm getting the pig!
Liking Jess's idea.
Also, Q & @.
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 12:39:20 pm PDT #4628 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
How is that different than saying that first deciding factor is which city more people can't attend?
Sean K - Aug 25, 2005 12:39:41 pm PDT #4629 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
I am however down with Q and @ as well.