Well, if it would help I could also add the option to choose:
Q = likes puppies
@ = hates cilantro
We knocked 'em deader!
Willow ,'Lies My Parents Told Me'
F2F 3: Who's Bringing the Guacamole?
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 12:33:20 pm PDT #4624 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 12:33:24 pm PDT #4625 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It's simple, and takes both preference and ability into account.
But .. two people loving to attend and two not being able to is equivalent to four being able to attend, and trumps three being able to attend and one not. Is that an intended effect?
Sean K - Aug 25, 2005 12:34:13 pm PDT #4626 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Sean, I don't understand what you're asking.
I think I don't either.
Nicole - Aug 25, 2005 12:34:26 pm PDT #4627 of 10001
I'm getting the pig!
Liking Jess's idea.
Also, Q & @.
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 12:39:20 pm PDT #4628 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
How is that different than saying that first deciding factor is which city more people can't attend?
Sean K - Aug 25, 2005 12:39:41 pm PDT #4629 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
I am however down with Q and @ as well.
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 12:40:22 pm PDT #4630 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
But .. two people loving to attend and two not being able to is equivalent to four being able to attend, and trumps three being able to attend and one not. Is that an intended effect?
It depends on how those people vote for the other city.
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 12:40:24 pm PDT #4631 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
How is that different than saying that first deciding factor is which city more people can't attend?
Who's that question directed at?
Vortex - Aug 25, 2005 12:41:23 pm PDT #4632 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
is the first deciding factor which city people CANT attend? that seems a bit negative to me.
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 12:41:31 pm PDT #4633 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I'm inclined to want something like:
0 = can't attend
1 = would attend (no preference)
2 = would LOVE to attend (strong preference)
I like the three categories, but I'm uncomfortable with one person really wanting that city trumping two who can't go there at all. I'm not sure how best to weight it though. Maybe using the LOVEs as more of a tie-breaker, if the raw numbers of can/can't attends are close?