Lets see what we can get in those parameters and proceed from there.

My impression is that people already have a good idea of what you can get from those intersecting sets -- close to nil in SF and perhaps others.

Then, the question is what gives first? The physical requirements, or the financial one?

It has seemed that the physical requirements are more important than the amount, no matter who'd be happy with no internet connection -- those that would be bereft have been vocal. And the financial requirement hasn't recently been met.

I did read your post. I also checked the dictionary, as follows:

Main Entry: re·quire·ment Pronunciation: -'kwIr-m&nt Function: noun : something required : a : something wanted or needed : NECESSITY b : something essential to the existence or occurrence of something else : CONDITION

I see wanted, needed, essential. It says nothing about compromise. It says nothing about negotiable.

Try reading MY post before you commence your eyeroll; if we're talking loose parameters and not requirements, I've got hotels for miles. But until Abi - who is the lady in charge - tells me differently, I'm assuming those requirements are hard and need to be met.

My impression is that people already have a good idea of what you can get from those intersecting sets -- close to nil in SF and perhaps others.

The only point person to check in on the issue is San Francisco. I'm having positive signs in Seattle. I'm pretty sure rooms in Vegas for under a hundred bucks also happen. Let's let people do their jobs and then see what our options are.

IFB sent to Vegas convention people.

FWIW, staying under $100 on The Strip nie impossible.

Let's let people do their jobs and then see what our options are.

Which, right now, means no hotels from SF. Is that what you mean? Because if you lose that requirement and present rooms that go for $109 or $119, then people can make up their own minds.

Obviously point people aren't aiming for penthouse suites, and are bearing financial restrictions in mind, but I think disallowing the presentations entirely is a little drastic.

A lot of people would rather be at a clean Motel 6

Maybe we could just steer clear of speaking for anyone else. Stating your own opinion is fine. Saying a lot of people tends to lead to problems.

Yup, this. I appreciate the diligence to keep costs down, but we also need to be realistic.

I'm going to toss in something from my years of convention-going that people may not be aware of. Hotels on the lower end of the price scale? Do NOT handle freaks well, and are usually located in areas where, even if there isn't a lot of crime, are not especially comfortable to walk around/to the corner store.

"Freaks" does not just mean eccentrically-dressed goths. In this context, it applies to all of us. Because those cheaper hotels & motels? Don't usually handle event crowds, even small ones, and having a group of people who are all obviously together makes them unsure of what to do, and the staff usually defaults to being very, very difficult. Including adding extra fees if they even suspect more than the registered number of people are staying in a room, random knocks on doors with suspicious "What are you people doing?" questions or "You're being noisy" comments (even if you aren't).

While I appreciate the need to offer an inexpensive alternative, I wanted to make sure people were aware of what some of the problems I'VE seen when event groups stay at the local Motel 6.

From the look of things, at least in SF and Vegas, it's going to come down to X amount of money if you want to hit all the bullet points on the amenities requirement list. From what Susan was saying, her early look at Seattle was a similar situation: the Comfort Inn, Susan, wasn't it? Was at just over $100 a night.

Vegas, there's always Summerlin, which has a couple of very nice hotels. Of course, if you stay in Summerlin and want to do anything at all that Vegas is famous for offering, it's a twenty-minute drive minimum, or hoping for public transport.

What about just off the strip? Or a mile from the strip using the shuttles?

I'm guessing the Seattle options won't be precisely downtown either, though there are some close possibilities from what I've seen so far.

It's nice to be in the dead center of everything, but is it really completely necessary? (And I ask this a person who lives in the dead center of everything and clearly likes that). Friday night we go out. Saturday is some sort of jaunt or two and can be a leisurely to and fro. Saturday night we, essentially, stay in. Sunday, again, is leisurely.

And Jilli nails yet another intangible that has to be considered.