Anyone have any wiki software recs? Open source, and editable (to hack security--I want something where one can control who adds and edits, and I want to replace their security with new).
She just... she just did the math.
Kaylee ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
§ ita § - Feb 23, 2006 4:55:38 am PST #7197 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Gudanov - Feb 23, 2006 5:29:50 am PST #7198 of 10003
Coding and Sleeping
All this chat software talk makes me want to set my chat software for something other than work, on the downside I have no contacts to put on there other than work.
amych - Feb 23, 2006 5:39:44 am PST #7199 of 10003
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
mediawiki and Twiki are the biggies if you need that kind of access control; mediawiki can probably handle the authentication stuff better out of the box, but it's a really big installation for a wiki -- depends on your use. You might also check out [link] for feature comparisons.
(edited because I had the wrong wiki...)
§ ita § - Feb 23, 2006 5:42:08 am PST #7200 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
mediawiki can probably handle the authentication stuff better out of the box
What I want to do is replace the authentication, so nothing will be out of the box. If it's big, though, I probably don't want to start there.
::marks post for link perusal at work::
amych - Feb 23, 2006 5:48:30 am PST #7201 of 10003
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
I wasn't clear -- I actually meant to say something more like "can handle authenticating via mechanisms other than just its own internal accounts" but then I don't know the setup you have in mind. Still, yes, big: it's the thing behind wikipedia, but it scales down a lot less well than it scales massive.
(D'oh! Just now read BBaBB -- oh, that wiki question...)
And on that note, are we looking for something php/mysql based?
§ ita § - Feb 23, 2006 6:41:06 am PST #7202 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
are we looking for something php/mysql based
Oh, yeah. Conversation in two places. Sorry! Yes. PHP 4.3.10 and MySQL 3.23.58.
amych - Feb 23, 2006 6:43:42 am PST #7203 of 10003
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
I'll poke through my notes -- I evaluated a metric assload of wiki implementations at work last year; it might as well turn out to be good for something.
TomW - Feb 23, 2006 7:26:25 am PST #7204 of 10003
"The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be."
Jessica - Feb 24, 2006 12:28:02 pm PST #7205 of 10003
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Apple will next week announce that it's going to start selling full-length movie downloads through the iTunes Music Store, if the forecast of a US market watcher is correct.
esse - Feb 24, 2006 12:56:50 pm PST #7206 of 10003
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
They've been talking about that for eight months. I'll be really interested to see if they are actually able to go through with it. I mean, what would the file size and type be? Could you only play it in iTunes? Would it therefore transform iTunes (as it more or less is now) from a music application to an all-around media application, like WMP?