Okay this: [link]?
Still a shrunken "no hotlinking"
I just noticed that when I click on it to show it full sized, a scrollbar appears at the bottom of the screen. OK, so that's where the 2400 pixel width went.
Simon ,'Safe'
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Okay this: [link]?
Still a shrunken "no hotlinking"
I just noticed that when I click on it to show it full sized, a scrollbar appears at the bottom of the screen. OK, so that's where the 2400 pixel width went.
So you never see something saying "hotlinking is bad"?
Dammit.
Eddie? Your .htaccess suggestion is failing me.
Henh, back in Netscape. Heath must still be in the cache or somesuch, because I still get him.
Heath really likes you, lori. It's the only explanation.
Thanks guys!
So you never see something saying "hotlinking is bad"?
Not that exact text, no.
On all four of those links, I see various hottt guys and one hottttt gal.
On all four of those links, I see various hottt guys and one hottttt gal.
I'm done testing now -- I set the .htaccess back to the default of allowing linking from b.org. During testing, I was swapping it in the place of fuckers.com (or xanga.com, if I'm being honest). Didn't work.
Yep - all images now. No "hotlinking is bad".
(or xanga.com, if I'm being honest)
I have a xanga site. I haven't used it in years.
t /completely useless
Don't know what to tell ya, ita. Worked for me in my testing. If you were just filtering against xanga.com, did you remove the OR flag and remove the second RewriteCond from that chain? Did you pretty much copy-paste, 'cause the syntax is a bit craxy in there (understatement).