On all four of those links, I see various hottt guys and one hottttt gal.
Xander ,'Get It Done'
Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
On all four of those links, I see various hottt guys and one hottttt gal.
I'm done testing now -- I set the .htaccess back to the default of allowing linking from b.org. During testing, I was swapping it in the place of fuckers.com (or xanga.com, if I'm being honest). Didn't work.
Yep - all images now. No "hotlinking is bad".
(or xanga.com, if I'm being honest)
I have a xanga site. I haven't used it in years.
t /completely useless
Don't know what to tell ya, ita. Worked for me in my testing. If you were just filtering against xanga.com, did you remove the OR flag and remove the second RewriteCond from that chain? Did you pretty much copy-paste, 'cause the syntax is a bit craxy in there (understatement).
If you were just filtering against xanga.com, did you remove the OR flag and remove the second RewriteCond from that chain?
Copy and paste -- I filtered against buffistas.org and xanga.com, and you can see the results. I did minor guessing tweaks in between each result to calibrate, and new joy.
Can you restart your httpd daemon on this server (after making changes to .htaccess)? I found that helped with mine, to get the new rules loaded.
Nope. It's a shared server. It seems to pick up on there being new rules with each save, since I can break and repair pretty quickly.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://(.*.)?xanga.com/.*$ [NC]
This line, there's no ! in front of ^http:// correct?
I'm trying to figure out why b.org matched on this rule.
Yup.
I can try again, if you're going to be around for a second or two.