I think that there's a big difference between our (genre fandom's) take on the Lost characters and the general television audience who are discovering genre tv for the first time. The second group are a far bigger section of those viewing the show on a weekly basis, unfortunately, so I think that the network is deliberately having the creators/writers sand off some of the rough edges that the characters had to begin with. In today's TVGO Watercooler, the writer had what is probably a more common view of Sawyer:
Say what you will, I still think Sawyer's a turd. Even if he's haunted about killing the wrong dude for the murder-suicide of his folks, that's no reason to be rude. Honestly, he deserved to be stalked by that boar simply for not telling Jack that he'd met his booze-bag ex-doctor father in that bar Down Under. Just wrong.
Don't get me wrong--I think that the general TV viewership is more intelligent than the suits seem to think they are. However, not many of them are going to stick around for all-dark-characters, all-the-time; this is why shows like Profit and Buffalo Bob (and Angel) bombed in the ratings compared to shows like Friends and West Wing. Ironically, if Lost were less successful, the characters might be more interesting to us!
They're still genrefied enough for me - the attempts to make Sawyer and Charlie more likeable/understandable are the only character notes that rankle consistently (as opposed to intermittently, like KateNJack4Evah). But I wish to the Heavens above that the writers would get a better handle on plot momentum and have people act as if they have working brains with self preservation instincts.
Here is the promo breakdown for next week's Lost episode:
Hmmmm, I think the Canadian previews must be different from the American ones. Up here we got "a shocking connection between Jack and Sawyer is revealed" right in the preview last week, and the preview last night for next week's episode had the raft on fire, but not anything with Locke shouting.
When I saw Duckett/Shrimp Guy (aka Jeff Perry), the role of his that sprung to my mind was Harvey Leek on Nash Bridges.
I feel a little less dorky now, since every time he was on screen last night I was yelling "Harvey!"
But still feeling dorky about this being in a post two screens back...hey, I'm trying to do labwork here, people...
What did everyone think about Charlie this episode?
A sad little dark woobie.
(I don't know what it says about me that, during the conversation between Sayid and Charlie, I was wondering what the Buffistas were going to make of the scene, given last week's conversation in this thread. That I've been sucked in, I suppose!)
Profit
On DVD in September! Finally!
Gods, that was a brilliant show.
What did everyone think about Charlie this episode?
I'm glad Drew retconned his motivations for shooting Ethan a bit (not so much retconned as added to in a sensible manner). I found him less unlikeable than I did at the end of last week's episode.
I do not have Charlie love. I really do feel like a stranger in a strange land when I go over to livejournal.
