Yeah, the 16 thing is creepy. With you there.
He's not 16 anymore, though, and that's what I'm talkin' 'bout.
Does anybody else miss the Mayor? 'I just want to be a big snake.'
Xander ,'End of Days'
Lost: OMGWTF POLAR BEAR
[NAFDA] This is where we talk about the show! Anything that's aired in the US (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though -- if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
JenP - Feb 09, 2005 6:15:01 am PST #5680 of 10000
Matt the Bruins fan - Feb 09, 2005 6:17:21 am PST #5681 of 10000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Unlike Pacey, he stayed with the teacher for quite a few years. I believe their child was born when he was 23.
§ ita § - Feb 09, 2005 6:32:51 am PST #5682 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Statistically, I call creepy. On a case by case basis -- I can't. Sometimes it is, sometimes it's as viable a relationship as between two thirty year olds.
Vonnie K - Feb 09, 2005 6:36:26 am PST #5683 of 10000
Kiss me, my girl, before I'm sick.
New episode! Lalala! New episode!
Do we know whose story this is supposed to be?
Am ignoring the disturbing Naveen talk, 'cause when you switch the gender around and it's a 16 year old girl and some skeevy male teacher? Mucho squicksome.
§ ita § - Feb 09, 2005 6:38:00 am PST #5684 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What if the male teacher isn't skeevy?
beathen - Feb 09, 2005 6:39:02 am PST #5685 of 10000
Sure I went over to the Dark Side, but just to pick up a few things.
Do we know whose story this is supposed to be?
This link give a brief synopsis and tells whose ep it is: [link]
Kathy A - Feb 09, 2005 6:39:31 am PST #5686 of 10000
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil
Vonnie, I've heard it's another Charlie story .
Kate P. - Feb 09, 2005 6:39:42 am PST #5687 of 10000
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love
Statistically, I call creepy. On a case by case basis -- I can't. Sometimes it is, sometimes it's as viable a relationship as between two thirty year olds.
Yeah, this.
Do we know whose backstory we get tonight?
edit: xposty
Lyra Jane - Feb 09, 2005 6:43:40 am PST #5688 of 10000
Up with the sun
Statistically, I call creepy. On a case by case basis -- I can't. Sometimes it is, sometimes it's as viable a relationship as between two thirty year olds.
Agreed. The squick I get, at least when we're talking about a 16 or 17-year-old, is less about the age difference and more about the fact the teacher is in a position of authority. I don't think it's usually a great idea for teenagers to date grown-ups, but people and situations vaery way too much for any general rule to make sense.
Vonnie K - Feb 09, 2005 6:47:24 am PST #5689 of 10000
Kiss me, my girl, before I'm sick.
What if the male teacher isn't skeevy?
I would call the situation itself skeevy, regardless of what the teacher is like, because there's major imbalance in power in a teacher/student relationship, and I can't imagine it being sexualized without at least some amount of exploitation. If it were an emancipated 16 year-old and an older dude she met in a coffee shop, then I wouldn't have much issue with that.
Thanks, Kathy & beathen!