Walt's mother is a bitch. Total bitch. And I'm wondering if somehow Walt caused her death..
Yep, that occured to me too. It seems like too much of a coincidence that she died of a sudden "mystery illness" and then he seems to have these strange "talents." Perhaps Walt felt some sort of subconscious rage towards her b/c of her treatment of his father (assuming that he had some vague memory of his father from when he was a baby) and this manifested as the blood disease. I also got the sense that Bryan suspected this, and that's why he was so eager to be rid of Walt.
Anyways, not a bad episode and not a bad show, I should try to catch it more often; has anyone read Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian? At times Locke reminds me of Judge Holden.
A fellow fan IM'ed me after the east coast airing, typing OMG-esque messages. He knew I hadn't yet seen the episode, so his description was thus:
"OMG its brilliant... and Kate is only in it for two minutes, and it is still brilliant ... that's how good it is!!!!."
Now I have seen it I agree.
Her two minutes were great though, weren't they? *swoon*
Nice job Mr. Fury. "Good work fella!" as we say in this faraway land.
Another thing just struck me about last night's episode:
The box o' birthday cards makes an earlier scene with Walt and Michael a
lot
more poignant in retrospect. Remember when Walt accused his dad of not even knowing when his birthday was? That must have hit Michael like a two-by-four across the noggin.
Nice catch, Anne.
Perhaps Walt felt some sort of subconscious rage towards her b/c of her treatment of his father (assuming that he had some vague memory of his father from when he was a baby) and this manifested as the blood disease.
Walt may have been mad at his mom, but I doubt it was because of her treatment of Michael. It looks to me as if she never told him about his real father at all.
Remember when Walt accused his dad of not even knowing when his birthday was? That must have hit Michael like a two-by-four across the noggin.
Yep. And it is just like Fury to make us think about previous scenes with his episodes. He did that to marvelous effect with Locke.
And Claire at the end was not an HSQ for me since I saw Emilie de Ravin's name in the credits and was waiting for her the whole time.
Wouldn't she be in there every week, because of being a regular? Like, was the (memfault) actor (Daniel Dae Kim???) who plays Jin in the credits last night, because he's a regular, even though he wasn't in this episode?
Daniel Dae Kim is a regular.
Emilie de Ravin is not. There's the rub.
Maybe they'll have t-shirts that say 'I Am Locke's Bitch, Don't Fuck With Me'."
Would "Locke's Bitch, but not Boone enough to admit it" be too spoilerific for a tag line?
Why was he so against Walt hanging out with Locke, anyway? Because Locke was a little creepy at first, then it became an issue of not backing down when Walt continued to hang out with him?
I would think it was a combination of this, and just everything else, too. I wouldn't like some strange (as in still relatively unknown-to-me) man hanging around my kid. For me, that's just a sad fact of life in this world. If my kid had been taken from me and I'd just gotten him back, and was trying to bond with him, I'd like it even less. And then the elements you've noted would come into play for me too, Nora. All in all, it would just be a big, "BACK OFF MY KID" thing for me.
I think I'd be pissed at anyone I found handing my 10 year old a big ass hunting knife when I wasn't around, but especially so in the circumstances Cindy set out.
