You aren't alone in the not reading, Kristen. I couldn't find a copy, and I was unwilling to pay for one. I have been fascinated, though, by the varying responses, especially when you factor in the various expectations caused by people's usual tastes in books. I would have taken everything at face value in the story, because the books I read are nearly always laced with unexpected things. It annoys me how people laugh or sneer (no one here, just in the general population) when they run into something that is outside their usual worldview. It's like the way some people will automatically reject SF or fantasy because it's "make believe." I know people who become almost angry when asked to read/see something with a fantasy base, like it's offense to them somehow.
'Shindig'
The Buffista Book Club: the Harry Potter iteration
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
During this lull in the discussion, do you think we should figure out which book(s) will follow Asher Lev?
Whoops, I'll post when I get home. I meant to do it before the discussion, but I've been swamped and with limited access recently, and didn't want to bury it in the middle of Intuitionist. My bad.
We still need to come up with a way to pick the next after that, though.
We still need to come up with a way to pick the next after that, though.
Yup. Do we have a procedure? Where did that discussion leave off?
I know something like this has been said before but I'm too busy tired lazy to go back and check. Anyway, here's a suggestion: how about instead of consensing on a book, we keep a running list of suggested books (as we've been doing) and figure out a way to pick a Buffista to make the selection from that list. Interested selectors can add their names to a list and then someone can put all the names in a hat, or run a randomizer or whatever and that person can pick the book from the list. We can even add a twist that the selected Buffista has to choose a book that they did not suggest.
I like that idea (mostly because I don't care how we choose, just so long as we keep picking and reading and discussing).
I do think this
We can even add a twist that the selected Buffista has to choose a book that they did not suggest.
is a particularly good idea though. I chose a book I hadn't read, becasue that was part of the fun of it- reading something I might not otherwise.
BTW- I'm really loving the current selection, which happened to be my pick preens.
The suggested plan (as far as I can remember) was:
Wolfram would pick book number one. DONE
Heather would pick book number two. DONE
brenda would pick book number three. TO DO
After that, we would randomly select the selector (like out of a hat, or something).
-t's book lists & recs. compliation posts are here:
-t's list of people who had recommended books up until that point is here:
Question/Request:
I think we had decided to link to these lists in the very first post (post #2) in this thread, but we didn't do it. Lilty, the next time you pop by, could you copy the info from this post into your post, please?
Also, I think we decided to post all the chosen books in that post. Only The Intuitionist is linked right now. Since we know the next book, we should put that information in our first post, as well (and once brenda picks book three, ditto).
I am neutral on whether or not we allow the selector of the month to choose one of his own books or not. That is, I think it's a good idea, but I also know we (Buffistas) tend toward getting to nitty gritty in our details, and then building a procedure that drives us batty. Either way though, I'm good.
What about new recommendations?
What about new recommendations?
What do you mean?
Well, we have a list linked of recommendations from the first go-round. Do we need to make any provision for new recommendations - particular days, say, or just a practice of gathering any recommendations that have come in since then before linking again? Or are we just sticking with what we've got for the next while?
I'm okay with whichever, just not clear.
FTR, I have no problem with someone picking their own rec - I just wouldn't really want to, myself.