Anya ,'Get It Done'
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
I like that idea (mostly because I don't care how we choose, just so long as we keep picking and reading and discussing).
I do think this
We can even add a twist that the selected Buffista has to choose a book that they did not suggest.
is a particularly good idea though. I chose a book I hadn't read, becasue that was part of the fun of it- reading something I might not otherwise.
BTW- I'm really loving the current selection, which happened to be my pick preens.
The suggested plan (as far as I can remember) was:
Wolfram would pick book number one. DONE
Heather would pick book number two. DONE
brenda would pick book number three. TO DO
After that, we would randomly select the selector (like out of a hat, or something).
-t's book lists & recs. compliation posts are here:
-t's list of people who had recommended books up until that point is here:
Question/Request:
I think we had decided to link to these lists in the very first post (post #2) in this thread, but we didn't do it. Lilty, the next time you pop by, could you copy the info from this post into your post, please?
Also, I think we decided to post all the chosen books in that post. Only The Intuitionist is linked right now. Since we know the next book, we should put that information in our first post, as well (and once brenda picks book three, ditto).
I am neutral on whether or not we allow the selector of the month to choose one of his own books or not. That is, I think it's a good idea, but I also know we (Buffistas) tend toward getting to nitty gritty in our details, and then building a procedure that drives us batty. Either way though, I'm good.
What about new recommendations?
What about new recommendations?
What do you mean?
Well, we have a list linked of recommendations from the first go-round. Do we need to make any provision for new recommendations - particular days, say, or just a practice of gathering any recommendations that have come in since then before linking again? Or are we just sticking with what we've got for the next while?
I'm okay with whichever, just not clear.
FTR, I have no problem with someone picking their own rec - I just wouldn't really want to, myself.
I thought recs were always open. People should rec carefully though so we don't end up having 100s of books on a list that can only accomodate 12 a year. Should we require new recs to have a second or something?
I have a rec that I mentioned in literary to resounding silence, but it is worth considering and is a recent book (1999). Say Goodbye: The Laurie Moss Story by Lewis Shiner. It is kind of a melancholy rock and roll journal. I liked it very much.
I would say wait until the old ones are used up first, or use them for a set period of time- dump them, and do it over again.
People should rec carefully though so we don't end up having 100s of books on a list that can only accomodate 12 a year. Should we require new recs to have a second or something?
I agree with this. I think it should be made retrospective too.
I would say wait until the old ones are used up first, or use them for a set period of time- dump them, and do it over again.
I think there were like thirty-something recs before. That's 3 years to use 'em up.
What if we limit it to 1 or 2 recs per person until that rec gets used or withdrawn by the suggestor?