I didn't have a real strong attachment to the character, but that was still awfully sad.
That's totally it. Rowling took a character I really didn't like (I think the movie made him extra annoying) and made me feel for his death.
Spike ,'Sleeper'
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
I didn't have a real strong attachment to the character, but that was still awfully sad.
That's totally it. Rowling took a character I really didn't like (I think the movie made him extra annoying) and made me feel for his death.
Count me among the "never knew how much I cared until he was gone" re: Dobby.
Yanking a wand out of somebody's hand seems a pretty low bar for changing ownership. If disarming with a spell counts, then wands have been changing ownership all over the place.
I totally agree with these sentiments. Ah, well.
Yeah. Me too. Maybe some wands are more fickle than others. Or, at first the want choses you and it SEEMS like love...
But after a while the bloom goes off the rose and the little things that used seem cute -- like scratching your head with it during potions -- become very annoying to the wand "I'm nothing but a tool to you... ok, fine, I AM a tool, but I'm not a damn head scratcher..."
Then one day in a DA meeting you end up flung and it feels like a relief...
Like that.
I really disliked Dobby but that "free elf" inscription very much made my allergies act up.
I cried when Dobby died. I didn't care one way or the other about him, but that was a well written scene.
I would have bet good money that she couldn't make me care about Dobby, and I found myself sobbing uncontrollably.
Well Voldemort has the Elder Wand now. This doesn't seem like a big deal since Harry isn't going to beat Voldemort in a duel anyhow. This means they are after the horcruxes now, starting with the one in Bellatrix's vault.
They also are working out a plan with Griphook for getting into the vault. The price of the sword is quite the problem, I don't have a good feeling about how that's going to work out. A big part of the reason I don't have a good feeling is Bill's warning about Goblins. Bill does seem to pretty much know what is going on. The plan hasn't even started yet and things are already not going as planned.
There was also the visit by Lupin with the news of the new baby. It's really heartwarming when Lupin asks Harry to be the Godfather. Too bad it means that Lupin is a dead man.
The plan has started with Hermione as Bellatrix. I enjoyed her 'Good Morning' slip. I've gotten to the part where Harry has imperioused the Gringott's Goblin and Trevers. Good thing that Griphook was there to spur Harry into action. This plan took weeks to come up with? Well, actually I can see it taking up weeks to brainstorm ideas and shoot them down until they are left with a plan that doesn't involve a lot of moving parts. Anyhow, they have moved from a plan to winging it.
It's really heartwarming when Lupin asks Harry to be the Godfather. Too bad it means that Lupin is a dead man.
Ha! I thought EXACTLY the same thing at that part.
I too had a bad feeling about the Gringott's plan, although mainly because of the goblin-cheating.
Yanking a wand out of somebody's hand seems a pretty low bar for changing ownership. If disarming with a spell counts, then wands have been changing ownership all over the place.
I totally agree with these sentiments. Ah, well.
MY POINT EXACTLY!!
Makes those D.A. sessions sort of uncomfortable doesn't it? "Expelliarmus! Hah, Neville, I guess your wand is mine now!" "Yeah, but...didn't you just let me 'Expelliarmus' your wand? Does that mean we have to trade wands now?" "Um. Shut up."
Perhaps the wand-taking has to have the taker voluntarily/explicitly taking the wand -- there's a necessary element of intent, not just a technical defeat, as in practice.