BWAHAHA!!
Jonathan ,'Touched'
The Buffista Book Club: the Harry Potter iteration
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
Odd thing I've noticed -- I don't recall ever noticing one any of the characters reading fiction, or reading anything other than for research or class, except for the ocassional Quidditch book. Seems like the sort of thing that Neville or Luna would do, curl up by the fireplace with a book, or Ginny, at least in the first few books, seems like the type of kid who'd get involved in a story and you'd have to drag her away from it, but I can't remember any scenes like that.
well, there was that whole thing with a diary . . .
Nonfiction!
And yet there are special wizarding fairy tales. You'd think that there would be wizarding kids adventure stories.
Okay, reading DH a second time has made me decide to read them all again. So far I've got the Philosopher's Stone and Chamber of Secrets done. Chamber of Secrets is a lot weaker than I remember.
Chamber of Secrets is a lot weaker than I remember.
Yeah. The first two books are fun and all, but the series doesn't take of until PofA.
JKR's growth as a writer is evident as you read them in rapid succession.
There is also some truth to the concept of sophomore slump, but she got past it.
I don't even know if it was a sophomore slump so much as an illustration of the difference a good editor makes. By her own admission, GoF and especially OotP were barely edited, whereas the editors were able to take a stronger hand in HBP and DH, which are by and large stronger books.
Part of the weakness of CoS is that there's a lot of exposition and recapping of what went on in PS, and it get really irritating. Philosopher's Stone gets a bye because all its exposition was world building. I really like how the later books pretty much assume the reader has been along for the ride and jump into the action.
Also, I found that Rowling seemed to be writing for an audience that was growing up. The first two books really feel like kiddie lit. I'm going to start Azkaban tonight, and I wonder what it will read like. I remember not liking it much when I read it, but we'll see how it goes in retrospect.