The Mundane Spoiler Challenge. Very amusing. Some are quite clever: "Ron impresses Hermione with his tongue in chapter 31."

To get a taste, check out the mundane spoilers for HBP. Some are hilarious.

The first six books in 100 words or less:

BOOK ONE:
Harry: :D
BOOK TWO:
Harry: :)
BOOK THREE:
Harry: :|
BOOK FOUR:
Harry: :/
BOOK FIVE:
Harry: :(
BOOK SIX:
Harry: :'

For those who hated the epilogue, I suggest reading this post, which is slightly ficcish in that it's written from Harry's perspective, but I consider it more of an analysis of what else is going on in that scene that Rowling didn't touch on.

My back had been going out anyway, but the hours of reading Harry Potter were the final blow. I just went to my chiropractor, who said I was the fifth person today attributing back pain to long hours with the Deathly Hallows. She's calling it the curse of Harry Potter. She's a friend, and the first thing she said was, "Don't tell me anything! I just got it yesterday."

Ha! I had neck pain yesterday.

I have a migraine today, and had to leave work because looking at manuscripts was making me ill. Possibly brought on by eyestrain?

One Slate author's comment on the book:

Nyuk:

...a long and only slightly ridiculous chapter set (maybe?) in the afterlife—which looks exactly like King's Cross railway station, except that the only bearded transient Harry meets is Dumbledore, and unlike the bums in King's Cross Dumbledore only exposes himself to Harry emotionally.

I liked the epilogue. I thought people liked endings that were ambiguous and anything could happen. All we know is that on that day, these families made an effort to be happy so their kids would get on the train in peaceful circumstances. We don't know what will happen at home when most of the kids are gone. Ron may secretly be a bastard to Hermione, he may be famous for hunting down every former Death Eater and making sure they're executed--except the ones who are useful. We don't know what Malfoy is acknowledging--a tryst, a conspiracy, whatever. Ginny may secrety hate Harry but won't give up the position of being Mrs. Harry Potter.

Harry is happy. Harry may be blinding himself so he can think he really did win and he did get his happy ever after.

And maybe it is happy ever after. Not everything is angst and suffering and sometimes people do get to be happy. So it wasn't a smart, hip, sophisticated, ambiguous, "life is full of pain and our actions will haunt us, woe, woe" ending. Maybe they are haunted. Maybe it isn't our business anymore, they keep their nightmares to themselves and have gotten on with being alive.

I just finished reading the Salon review -- it's nice enough, but I really cannot recommend the letters in response highly enough. Comedy gold!

The whining and wailing and proclamations that Salon Is Now A Rag and I Have Lost Respect For You FOREVAR!!1! for posting so many horrible and highly specific spoilers before the book even came out!!1!!1 (despite the fact that the review was posted on the morning of the official release date and the only spoiler, that Harry survives and has kids, is safely hidden on page 2 behind a giant red WARNING! SPOILERS! tag)!

The indignant How Can You Waste Time On This Pap When We're In The Middle Of An Unjust War, You Bastards!

The smug Enjoy Your Kiddie Books And Your Action Figures, You Retards! More Proust For Me!

Gold, I tell you. Sheer gold.

And as to the actual book... I can barely think about it or I start crying. Hedwig! Mad-Eye! Umbridge's desecration of his eye, and Ron's crisis of conscience over the wife of the man he was impersonating! And Dobby. And the small matter-of-fact almost sidelong mention of Lupin and Tonks, which wrecked me more than an onstage death scene would have. And the echoes of Tolkien and Narnia and the perfect folktale rhythm of the tale of the three brothers who cheated Death and were cheated in return. And brilliant Hermione and lionhearted Neville and the Dumbledore family and Harry and the Stone and his family and... wah. I gobbled it all down between Saturday and Sunday night, and I may need to wait a few days and then reread, and then maybe I'll have something coherent to say.

Do we know anything about the order in which he made the Horcruxes? Obviously, Harry was last, and I'd make a bet at Nagini being the one before him. But other than that? I think we know what order he acquired the objects in -- diary at school, ring soon after from the Gaunt's house, then cup from the old woman, locket from the store, and then tiara from Albania?

The murder of his father was making the first Horcrux? So that would be the ring, which he then hid back at the Gaunt's? He killed his grandparents at the same time, but the only other object that he could have made into a Horcrux then would have been the diary. So either he was carrying around potential Horcrux objects for the ten years or so, or he made some of them into Horcruxes already. He can't have made too many yet, because when he came to ask for the job, he still looked fairly human. I'm guessing that the locket was one of the last ones, and that he hid it soon after he made it.

So that's: 1: Ring. I'll guess 2: Tiara. Then that leaves the cup and diary as 3 and 4, then the snake and locket as 5 and 6. Does that all make sense?

I thought he made the diary into a Horcrux when Myrtle was killed, but I don't know where I got that. And he hid the tiara when he asked for the job, right? He could have done the locket anytime after he acquired it and just worn it, but I agree that he hid it late.