But top grossing stars are often not great actors or even in great movies. I mean, who has classic film fest of the movies of Tyrone Power?
'Dirty Girls'
Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
But top grossing stars are often not great actors or even in great movies. I mean, who has classic film fest of the movies of Tyrone Power?
I think that between Samuel L. Jackson, Harrison Ford, Tom Hanks, Eddie Murphy, Tom Cruise, Bruce Willis, James Earl Jones, Mel Gibson, Jim Cummings, and Gene Hackman there are hours, if not days, of viewing fun.
I don't have to add Schwarzenegger because he's temporarily retired.
To me, that helps keep him on the list -- if/when he leaves elected office, his films will probably still do pretty well on the strength of his charisma. But I can understand keeping him off given that all this is hypohetical.
Someone wake me when the only 4 real stars in Hollywood aren't 4 people who 9 times out of 10 make me run screaming from the theatre.
I think some of the things that make you (and this is more a people-like-you you, than a you-individually you) want to run screaming -- the big smiles and insistence that they be lovable!, and the media overexposure -- may also be the things that help make someone a big star. So this day may never come. Sorry.
And I agree that most actors now succeed or fail on the strength of the franchise, not on their own merits.
ita, yeah, I meant that top stars may make some folk run screaming from the theater, but that's not a new phenomenon. There have always been actors and actresses who the public will happily pay to see, even if (maybe BECAUSE) they are in bad movies. I didn't mean to imply that being a top star means you are necessarily in bad stuff.
I think putting Gene Hackman on the list is kind of like cheating -- his career is like a corporate bullpen session. There is no shit he has not thrown on the wall (sometimes, his acting skill elevates a crappy project into bizarre fun!), so it's not exactly a surprise that some of it has stuck. Same with Michael Caine.
Not that I can say anything bad about the man who starred in The Poseidon Adventure.
John Ratzenberger, babee! Well, okay, just his voice, but still! Top ten!
And I can't freaking believe how much Bruce Almighty made. Man, that movie was terrible.
I choose to believe it was because people wanted to see Morgan Freeman play God.
I choose to believe it was because people wanted to see Morgan Freeman play God.
Uh, remember the trailer with the whole I GOT DE POWER - BOMP! with the skirt flying up in the air? I'm guessing that had appeal in certain quarters.
Tangent break, but has any documentary ever even been nominated for best picture at the Oscars? I'm trying to explain to someone elsewhere on the Internet that it wasn't a slam on Michael Moore that he didn't get a best picture nomination, but rather a question of genre -- Moore gambled all-or-nothing for a best picture, and lost, which he probably should have foreseen, because they don't ever nominate docs in that category and I doubt F911 was so much better than every single documentary made in the last 77 years that it could jump that hurdle.
It would be helpful if I was not crazy wrong.
Someone wake me when the only 4 real stars in Hollywood aren't 4 people who 9 times out of 10 make me run screaming from the theatre.
Me, too. (Have all 4 ever appeared in the same movie? I'm assuming no, because that would be one hell of a weird movie.)