Buffistas.org
I go online sometimes, but everyone's spelling is really bad. It's... depressing.

Tara ,'Get It Done'

Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned  

Closed Film and TV threads

A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.

First Previous Next Last Recent
§ ita § - Feb 20, 2005 7:12:15 am PST #9196 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Saw Aviator last night, and Collateral yesterday morning. I understand precisely why Aviator is nominated for best picture, but it didn't really grab me. Well done, interesting, but not compelling.

And long, lordie, long.

Speaking of judging on own merits (okay, that was in Natter) -- I know nothing about how Hughes actually appeared, and only know Hepburn from movies, not interviews, etc. Were they spot on? They were good for a story that wasn't tied to real lives, but I couldn't judge them on anything more than that.

I really enjoyed Collateral, and realise there's no way Foxx could have got a leading nom for it, but he was definitely not supporting anyone in it.

Lilty Cash - Feb 20, 2005 7:12:20 am PST #9197 of 10001
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."

Any Rent fans- can someone explain a scenario in which they do two days of filming for the movie in Santa Fe that wouldn't be ridiculously silly?

Scrappy - Feb 20, 2005 7:13:38 am PST #9198 of 10001
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

Foxx owns Collateral.

§ ita § - Feb 20, 2005 7:16:46 am PST #9199 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

2004 -- year of the Foxx, hands down.

Jesse - Feb 20, 2005 7:25:37 am PST #9200 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Any Rent fans- can someone explain a scenario in which they do two days of filming for the movie in Santa Fe that wouldn't be ridiculously silly?

He actually goes, doesn't he? Aw. Rent.

Lilty Cash - Feb 20, 2005 7:28:46 am PST #9201 of 10001
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."

Well, he does, but you never see him there. Even a packing/unpacking montage doesn't seem like it warrants two days of shooting vs. FIVE in the Village.

My nightmare is some dream sequence for the song Santa Fe.

Jesse - Feb 20, 2005 7:31:09 am PST #9202 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Yeah, dream sequence was my first thought, really.

Jesse - Feb 20, 2005 7:56:27 am PST #9203 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

So, wait. Where's the Rent movie info? I just looked on imdb, and almost all the Bway people are listed, which is very exciting, except...aren't they too old now?

Lilty Cash - Feb 20, 2005 8:00:21 am PST #9204 of 10001
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."

Well, I've got a friend who's got a friend working on the movie, so she knew about locations stuff. She didnt talk about casting, as we were too busy constructing the aforementioned Santa Fe dream sequence train wreck.

I had checked imdb, though, and I think that the only two casting changes from the original were Rosario Dawson as Mimi and Traci Thoms as Joanne. That could be all wrong, though.

Jesse - Feb 20, 2005 8:02:59 am PST #9205 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Right on. Man, I loved Rent. Now I can't decide if I'm excited or dreading it.

First Previous Next Last Recent