Please tell me that's not Ben Kingsley.
But I don't like lying.
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Please tell me that's not Ben Kingsley.
But I don't like lying.
But I don't like lying.
What the heck did they have on him?
What the heck did they have on him?
They must have had pictures of him having sex with Anthony Hopkins, which is the only way to explain his appearance in Mission: Impossible II.
Was that Alex Ross work
Yes it was.
You just can't unremember the information that was given in the narration, so it's impossible for me to know if there is enough information in the "director's cut" to thoroughly understand the movie. I also seem to remember more focus on the eyes in the re-released version, but that may be because I was paying more attention on the re-watch.
Yes, this. This sums up the BLADE RUNNER conundrum for me on which is the preferable version. In actuality, it's the one version conflated in my brain that's definitive. I am glad I still have a copy of the original VHS release, though.
eta Insert obligatory recommendation of the book FUTURE NOIR here - it's a big book on the making of BLADE RUNNER from novel through the director's cut re-release.
Last night I rewatched Blade Runer (Director's cut) and I agree with much of what people have said. I have not seen the voice-over version in ages and I've forgotten what additional info the voice-over gives you.
So, um, what's the extra info?
I saw a version of the narrated BR on TV a couple of months ago, and the only detail that stands out in my mind is the fact Deckard is divorced. (His wife called him a cold fish.) But, you know, looking at him, did you really think he was happily married?
I think the other problem with the voiceover is that film noir tended, at first, to use it in surprising ways; but the VO legacy is of irritating summary and annoyingly obvious rhetoric. It's still possible to have a VO be the exact right tool to use (see Double Indemnity and Sunset Boulevard ) to convey that intimately mannered viewpoint without being dull, but I think that VO tends to be used carelessly more often than not.
Apparently the movie of The Oddyssey is going to be a fantasy film but from Telemachus' p.o.v.
The TV miniseries version of The Odyssey from a few years ago was wonderful.
How a Meek Comic Book Company Became a Hollywood Superpower -- from the NYT so registration required. (I believe that there is a buffistas/foamy one for the NYT.)