Other than Se7en (which has a fantastic last 20 minutes, pity about the hour and a half preceding it)

I haven't seen it in a long time. I ought to. It does get major points for using a remix of "Closer" for the opening credits.

(Fight Club being one of my desert island movies, after all.)

I own the DVD. I've seen it at least four times now, probably. I need to listen to all the commentaries on that disc. I wish I had the two-disc version, though.

But I can't hear his name without thinking of the Editing Room's Panic Room script parody, especially this line:

Hee hee hee. On the money. Panic Room was all right, a decent thriller. Not exceptional.

The Game is one hell of a mindfuck. Loved it.

ETA: Appropriate post number.

The Game is one hell of a mindfuck. Loved it.

Ohhhhh, I'd forgotten he did that one. I may have to amend my "Fincher fan" status to "think he's an interesting enough director that I'll see his films in theatres in spite of how much I hated The Game."

There are at least twelve points in that movie where it should have ended. None of them occur at the end of the film.

Jessica, you hated Donnie Darko, too. Probably something else I liked. I take your hate with a grain of salt. ;-}

And because it's always fun to make fun of people on the IMDb boards, here's someone's opinion on Alien: Resurrection :

Some scenes with no realism:

-The scene under water, they are under water for about 5 min. after 200 years tecnology has changed but humans haven`t evolved to be more like fish.

With Jessica, despised The Game. In fact, Panic Room is the Fincher I remember most fondly.

I actually liked Se7en, myself, but I haven't seen the Game yet. I liked Panic Room.

I take your hate with a grain of salt.

What you must remember is that you are a wrongheaded crackpot about such things, and I am not. I am always right.

The first time I saw Se7en, I walked in late and only saw the last 20 minutes (in which we get not only supercrazycalm Kevin Spacey, but also Gwyneth Paltrow's head in a box). And I thought it was fucking brilliant.

Then I saw the whole thing, and I realized how completely mundane the movie is. (And since it doesn't realize it's mundane, it's doubly pretentious.) Very disappointing.

I have a thing for "American Justice" on A&E. Last week, they had a case where a woman was kidnapped and turned into a sex slave for 7 years. One of the things her captors did to her was retrofit their waterbed to hold a drawer in the base that this woman had to stay in when she wasn't performing sex acts or doing the dishes. She called it "the box."

"What's in the box? What's in the box?" became the saying of the evening again.

Se7en distrurbed me like Angel Heart disturbed me, which I guess means they both did their job.

Except for the abysmal acting in Angel Heart, I could not look at the 'craft' of either of the films because I was too busy covering my eyes or concentrating on keeping down my lunch.

Put me off my feed for three days.

Not in a good way, like The Fly. (I like both versions but the Jeff Goldbloom one actually made me queasy.) That was a gleeful creep out.

Hmph.

So the Shyamalan expose was a hoax.

Soon, there will be no actual news. Only mocku-trash.
Oh, wait that may already be the case.

Then again, I've gotta check the hypocracy meter because I loved Peter Jackson's Forgotten Silver .

Stroke of genius, that was. so I'm not sure why the SciFi 'publicity stunt gone too far' ticks me off so much.

No, I know why. One was in good fun and the other used 'tragedy' to dupe people. Feh.

Se7en distrurbed me like Angel Heart disturbed me, which I guess means they both did their job.

What's so impressive to me about Se7en is that it is frequently touted as an extremely violent movie, which is untrue. There are exactly two instance of on-screen violence in the movie, and they are both very tame.

The closest the movie comes to that is some not very graphic hints of dead bodies and crime scenes. Even those are tame, and much more is suggested than is shown.

What causes people to come away thinking it's a very violent or graphic film is that in all these scenes of the aftermath of intense violence, Pitt and Freeman are completely undisturbed by what is, to the rest of us, very disturbing. This sets up a jarring cognitive dissonance for many viewers, insisting that they fill in the blanks.

There's a great story that Fincher relates on the commentary to Se7en, where he talks about a woman coming up to him at a party and brow beating him for "showing everybody the woman's head in the box at the end."

He tried to explain to her that she was very mistaken, that they never actually show her head in the box (and they don't), but the woman was having none of that -- she knew what she'd seen.

So the Shyamalan expose was a hoax.

Not to pick on you, but you honestly thought otherwise? This is the same network that ran a "documentary" about the film students who got lost in the woods, which the "true story" of Blair Witch Project was based on.

I knew from the moment they started running adds for that Shyamalan "expose" that it was a hoax.