Frosted Flakes.

I just watched Garden State again, and in case anyone's wondering it's still a really great movie. Yet somehow I think it was funnier in the theater. I'm not sure why.

I tried watching Hero and had to turn it off about an hour in. Pretty? Yes. Did I care about any of them? No. Oh look, more slo-mo twirling in the air. Ooh, neat. Not so neat the 62,523rd time.

I would like to see House of Flying Daggers, however. That one looks like it would be more interesting.

I saw Hotel Rwanda and A Very Long Engagement. I think the key to enjoying A Very Long Engagement is to NOT see it directly following Hotel Rwanda. In another mood, I might have liked it, but not today. After Rwanda's raw brutality, being bombarded with that much sly charming cuteness was just exactly the wrong thing to watch, especially coming from another war story.

But everyone should see Hotel Rwanda. Don Cheadle blew me away, and the story itself is gut-wrenching.

and the story itself is gut-wrenching.

not so eager to have gut wrenched...

I think the key to enjoying A Very Long Engagement is to NOT see it directly following Hotel Rwanda.

I think the key to enjoying pretty much ANYTHING would be to not have it directly following Hotel Rwanda. After that movie, you should just go sit in the park and feed the ducks, or stare at shoppers in the food court, or lie on the couch with your eyes closed. Nothing that actually requires you to think, because the thinking part of your brain will be busy for a while.

Um, I think one of the dealers in the Wire has a part in that one, too.(/my new show likes carrots) Have not seen it yet because I hardly see movies in the theaters anymore.

I succumbed to the allure of not caring very much what I watched today. Thus I ended up watching Nurse Betty and Sabrina (the one with Harrison Ford and Greg Kinnear) on USA.

I found Nurse Betty touching and I bawled. I love Morgan Freeman, and I think Chris Rock is a workmanlike actor (not bad/pretty good kinda thang). Renee Zellweger doesn't bother me the way she does some people, and I thought she was really quite lovely in this. Even with commercials and bleepings, I really enjoyed it. I could be coming down with something, of course, but it was much better than I had expected having watched making-of, interviews, and so on. Which just goes to show that studio marketing generally sucks the big green weanie.

I liked Sabrina, too, but I have to say it was mostly because I remember the original and didn't actually "watch" it, watch it. I more listened to it and glanced at it occasionally. Harrison Ford playing Linus kinda wigged me out - I'm not saying he acted badly, it's just that my mother likes him now, for crying out loud (and I used to have the biggest crush on him based on Han Solo and Indiana Jones), so watching him try to flirt with and kiss a pretty young thing wasn't something I felt up to. Creepy.

At least it wasn't John Malkovich, the number one reason why I preferred Le Liasons Dangereuses to Dangerous Liasons. Well, he and Glenn Close, because she creeps me out too. "You're wearing paniers, dude!" .....Just my little nod to Keanu...

I saw Hotel Rwanda and A Very Long Engagement. I think the key to enjoying A Very Long Engagement is to NOT see it directly following Hotel Rwanda. In another mood, I might have liked it, but not today. After Rwanda's raw brutality, being bombarded with that much sly charming cuteness was just exactly the wrong thing to watch, especially coming from another war story.

The asshat reveiwer for the Boston Phoenix (Peter Keough - who I fucking despise and he just. won't. leave.) went on bitching about how they had to throw some kind of feel good story into RWANDA. It sounds to me like they told one of the few stories they could and not just have a filmed atrocity.

Granted, there's the whole question of whether such stories should be dramatized at all (SCHINDLER'S LIST being the big example here), but given the general incomprehensible indifference to what happened in Rwanda (in this country at least), I'm a touch skeptical of this position. Some things need to be known, however they get known.

I was going to say. Welcome to Sarajevo could technically be called a "feel-good story" about the implosion of Yugoslavia, except that in fictional film format, it brought to the public some raw (real) footage they would never have seen otherwise. The videos of bodies were too much for standard news broadcast. And, I don't think all that many people walked away from Welcome to Sarajevo feeling all overcome by the wunnerfulness of the human spirit.

went on bitching about how they had to throw some kind of feel good story into RWANDA.

Well I know watching innocent people being hacked to death with machetes always makes me feel good...

I can kind of see what he's saying, but I never had the sense that the story was overly tarted up for Hollywood. Yes, he found the two girls at the end, but, unless the title card at the end was a blatant lie, THAT REALLY HAPPENED, so what were the filmmakers supposed to do?