The second has a couple funny bits, and the third is pretty awful.
The second one was worth it just for Scott Evil's glam-rock look on Jerry Springer.
Xander ,'Empty Places'
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
The second has a couple funny bits, and the third is pretty awful.
The second one was worth it just for Scott Evil's glam-rock look on Jerry Springer.
Gandalfe is me, on the Seth Green glam-rock Jerry Springer front.
While I wouldn't pick Without a Paddle as a great piece of filmmaking, Seth is a lot of fun in it. If you can stand 95 minutes of Matthew Lillard, it might be worth seeing. (There's a wonderful surprise guest star near the end.)
In other news, Ju-on is unexpectedly showing at a theater in my city. I expect Sunday night will be the last good night's sleep I get for some time.
The later two Austin Powers movies made the mistake, so common in movies these days, of confusing self-reference and repetition with humor.
I didn't hate Party Monster, but I thought Macaulay Culkin was simply awful in it.
The Grudge previews creep me the frell out. I'll probably wait until it moseys along to Netflix to see it, though.
Finally caught up. So much I wanted to comment on, but I was hundreds of posts behind.
I do have to take a moment to stick up for "The Fifth Element" though, as I love that movie. Yeah, the love bit at the end is silly, but it's a fun over-the-top anime-style action movie. Though it would have been even better if Chris Tucker's character had died painfully. He's the only part of the whole thing that really bothers me.
While I wouldn't pick Without a Paddle as a great piece of filmmaking, Seth is a lot of fun in it. If you can stand 95 minutes of Matthew Lillard, it might be worth seeing.
Matt, the previews struck me as overly homophobic, which turned me way the hell off. Is the movie not as bad as the preview made it out to be?
Matt, the previews struck me as overly homophobic, which turned me way the hell off. Is the movie not as bad as the preview made it out to be?
Well, the huddled-together-against-the-rain-in-their-underwear bit is homophobic, but it also turns out to be one of the funnier jokes of the movie. And within the context of the scene I really couldn't blame Dax Kelly's character for not being happy. The only other thing I can think of that's offensive in that way is the scene with the angry lesbian who catches her girlfriend cheating, and that's specifically set up to show Kelly as a clueless horndog.
The later two Austin Powers movies made the mistake, so common in movies these days, of confusing self-reference and repetition with humor.
It's a mistake that Mike Meyers is especially guilty of. I blame bad habits learned from Lorne Michaels.