I saw Starship Troopers last night.
Gah. Gah. Gah. Had to put on a bad Stargate episode afterwards to get the taste out of my mouth.
That's the worst movie I've seen voluntarily in several years. I used the fast-forward button liberally.
Oz ,'Storyteller'
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I saw Starship Troopers last night.
Gah. Gah. Gah. Had to put on a bad Stargate episode afterwards to get the taste out of my mouth.
That's the worst movie I've seen voluntarily in several years. I used the fast-forward button liberally.
The weird thing is that Hugh Jackman can open a musical -- everybody, hands-down, agrees that the only thing that made The Boy From Oz worth seeing was Jackman, and that Jackman made it well worth seeing. They're closing it when he leaves -- even the producers know it's a lost cause.
Jackman can keep a musical alive, but not a movie.
That's a movie that gets film geeks at each other's throats, Suela. One camp find it a pointed satire on fascism and patriotism using visual tropes from propaganda films in interesting ways, the other (heretofore known as the "right" camp, as it's the one I'm in) feels that it doesn't work as satire because the commentary needs to be read into it, rather than being there to be understood. For the right camp, it's a flat sci-fi film loaded with dull 2-D characters.
Jackman can keep a musical alive, but not a movie.
You say that, but let them try and mount Swordfish! and see how that fares.
I'm glad he made the show, and not just in a rubbernecking sort of way -- it wasn't like Jordan selling Barons tickets, was it?
Didn't he get a Tony? Or at least a Tony nom?
That doesn't sound like Jordan selling Barons tickets to me.
Knowing nothing about the facts, I'm always deeply cynical of the amount of attention garnered by crossovers. But concomitantly happy when it's not a Barons thing.
But Jackman started in theater--it's not a crossover. Some actors, like Kevin Kline or Matthew Broderick, go back and forth between theater and film all the time.
He got a Tony, and it was an astonishing performance. The woman I saw it with said "He was as good as the show was bad."
So yeah, the show's closing because it sucks, but it's been a success because he was the star.
Count me amoung the right with Starship Troopers. It also really bothered me that the book I remembered had a bleak and impersonal mechanized battlefield, and juxtaposed that with the traditional human training.
I do not recall the film having much to do with the book though.
ita! I came up with an analogy to my Denzel "type" thing. Let's see if it works: If someone asked me to describe "a Buffy episode," I'd pretty much describe a MOTW ep from earlier in the run -- the gang fighting some scary thing, with quips along the way, etc. It clearly doesn't describe every episode, or even the preponderance of later episodes, and it definitely doesn't describe most of the great ones. But it's still my general feeling of what "a Buffy episode" is like.
Did that make any sense?