Lorne ,'Why We Fight'
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Or maybe they are still negotiating. . . and man -- that's a lot of baddies, isn't it?
I want Venom, dammit! And Teppy wants Kraven! And later on, if the franchise gets stale, they can have this ridiculous installment where the villains are Scorpion and Vulture and Rhino and a bunch of other animal-themed losers.
The original Japanese Ring movie was flat-out terrifying at times in ways that the Naomi Watts version couldn't quite match, despite the hard-to-accept psychic-answers-to-scary-questions deus-ex machina-plot turns. When they finally got to the moments where we saw the angry spirit, my skin crawled like it was trying to leave the room without me.
MM -- does the second thing in your post happen? (I don't read the comic so I don't know. . . and I don't remember that from the cartoon.)
No it doesn't, sumi. That's what I liked.
I made my husband repeatedly assure me that possession was not real and there were no demons in my apartment after I watched it.
You are aware that Blatty based the book on a supposedly real exorcism case in the 40s, right?
I saw The Ring the night before "Hellbound" aired last season, and was practically laughing at DeKnight's best efforts to terrify us. Willow's outfits have scared me more than anything in that episode.
I think the scariest thing about the original Ringu is something that was cut: a scene where Asakawa finds Ryuji's thesis with "HELL IS REAL" scribbled on it, apparently during his lethal visitation from Sadako.
Finally saw Spiderman 2 this weekend. Really liked it a lot.
I don't have a lot of comics expertise to bring to movies made from comics. I sort of feel , these days, like it's heresy here on b.org tantamount to admiting hatred of ME shows to say this, but I don't read comics. I don't like comics. I don't get comics. They give me vertigo (And not the McKean sort of Vertigo, either). The art interferes with the story, for me. I can't assimilate the implied movement, figure out which dialog balloon in a given panel should be read first, assimilate a visage change...all stuff schoolchildren do with alacrity. But even as a schoolchild, I found comics impenetrable. If someone would do a text-only version, I'd happily read that. But comics art? Not so much.
In any case, in that picture of Liam ita posted, he looks like Roy Dotrice.
I don't think I'm really happy about that.
Beverly--also not a comics person, even though I know lots of comic artists (BF's uncle is a famous comics guy who runs a school for illustrators in NJ, plus we just know and hang with a bunch of comics folk), Have actually edited some comic books, and love works ABOUT comic books. I know they're a great art form and have lots to offer which I am missing out on, I just can't get into them.
I don't like comics. I don't get comics.
t shuns Beverly
shuns Beverly
::hangs head::
I know. It's a shunning offense. But on the bright side? Robin's in my corner! Woo!
Robin's got a superhero name, though, Beverly. So she's kinda grandfathered in to the cool kids club.
Won't somebody think of the comics-impaired? Would a text version be so difficult to do? Think of it as--braille for the differently-sighted!