I just barely realised today that one of the local "art" theaters is 2 blocks away from my work, and I get a 2 hours lunch nowadays. This could be a bad combination.
Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
This is the part of the conversation where I start to babble about film being an audiovisual medium
Another thing about the movie was the fact that I thought, "Oh, he's doing that thing where he's 'speaking in images.' Shit, and it's working."
NYT review of Catwoman.
Like "Garfield," "Catwoman" is really a parody of catitude, offering glib mockery of a domestic species notorious for its pride and hauteur. It exhibits nothing like the sympathy that "Spider-Man" brings to the melancholy arachnid soul, or the insight that "Shrek 2" offers into donkey neurosis. But the cats of the world will get over this insult. Most likely by sleeping through it.
"Catwoman" is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). There is some violence, and a sex scene from which the ear-splitting yowls have been deleted.
If she makes Snow Bitches next.....
Isn't that basically what Catwoman is in the context of her career? It has the domestic pet imagery, and ends up doing a 180° from the intended mood (Snow Dogs was intended to be a comedy, and Catwoman wasn't...).
Next up, watch Halle abduct a bus full of Desi Arnaz impersonators.
On a COMPLETELY unrelated note, any Cronenberg fans interested in his early, completely self-made experimental movies should note that two of them are on the 2nd disc of the special 2-disc FAST COMPANY dvd. FAST COMPANY being the shoot-out at the dragstrip exploitation movie he made (either before THE BROOD or SCANNERS, can't remember which) which is an unabashed B-movie with with stars to match (Claudia Jennings, John Saxon, etc.).
I just watched STEREO and, yeah, it's basically a student film, but it's not dumb. I figure it HAS to be a satire, since it takes place at the CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR EROTIC INQUIRY. :) The man did have a good eye for striking architecture and composition even then, though. And he photographed and edited the damn thing himself back in the very early 70s. I believe he managed to beat John Waters at the DIY thing, even, and with a helluva lot more style.
Also, the most prominent actor looks like a really fey, and (believe it or not) an even-more-creepy-than-either cross between Walken in DEAD ZONE and Spader in CRASH.
CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR EROTIC INQUIRY.
hey, it could happen....we happen to be very curious...
CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR EROTIC INQUIRY.
hey, it could happen....we happen to be very curious...
And if anyone could turn sexual curiosity into a bureaucracy, it's us.
OTOH, committee meetings could be slightly more tolerable.
Next up, watch Halle abduct a bus full of Desi Arnaz impersonators.
OTOH, at least Rat Race was supposed to be a comedy.
Skippity-doo-da--after taking an entire day away from my computer. Unprecedented. (plus venetian blinds got washed in the bathtub...it was an ordeal)
Magnolia grew on me like kudzu. I could not get it out of my mind for days and days. The themes, the visuals, the possibilities. It wasn't a love-based fascination, but an intoxication in the almost literal sense.
oops. gotta go. more later.
I saw A Farewell to Arms on TV. Rock Hudson pretty, and bonus points for a romantic lead named "Frederick." Also some good "war is hell" scenes.
But really, a love story where no chemistry appears until the last half hour? What's the point?