self-googled.
Something about this phrase strikes me as....unseemly.
Giles ,'Selfless'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
self-googled.
Something about this phrase strikes me as....unseemly.
As long as he does it in the privacy of his own home, what's the harm?
As long as he does it in the privacy of his own home, what's the harm?
Dude. There are kids in said home. Won't somebody think of the children?
niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiines
</Bill Clinton>
Is it wrong that I'm most bothered by #35's needless redundancy?
Numberslutazade
Yes. Even more disturbing than the actual search terms is the fact that the person seems to think that Google is perhaps not producing enough "torture" related results, and that by putting extra emphasis on the desire for web pages relating to "torture," they'll somehow get more satisfactory search results.
No, the most disturbing part is that we were one of the satisfactory search results.
Actually, even more disturbing than that is the diligence with which this person went through their results, checking out each page. That search string, even with the highest level of filtering set in Google preferences?
Does not produce b.org in the first five pages.
Huh, if we're a valid response to the creepy torture search string, Google won't let me see it, no matter how strict or loose my settings.