"500 Suggestions, No Actual Decisions"!
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Can you clarify this for me? Are you saying that by your absence you should have no impact on the decision?
I don't think I'd say it like that. I'm saying, if you want to have an impact on the decision, participate.
So if no one voted but three people and two voted yes, it should go? I think a quorum is an important factor in voting. I also see where the people who think no preference shouldn't be an option are coming from.
I think a quorum is an important factor in voting. I also see where the people who think no preference shouldn't be an option are coming from.
So what you're saying lisah is, you have no preference?
Not serious board names:
Like eternity, but longer
I voted no preference but I didn't mean it
Is board culture like yogurt?
I voted no preference but I didn't mean it
Ha!
But seriously. I don't think I've ever voted no preference. I don't get *not actually wanting something to pass* but voting for it anyway. I would posit this is why almost everything that goes to a vote passes.
So what you're saying lisah is, you have no preference?
hah! that was Liese, actually. I see the word 'quorum' and my vision blurs and I can't see well enough to type any kind of opinion about it.
MY mouse is completely spastic today. or possibly my finger. geez.
I don't get *not actually wanting something to pass* but voting for it anyway
Is that how you interpret "no preference"? I think of it as "not caring how things go; just wanting them to fucking go (or to ensure the discussion is verboten for a while either way)."