love love love "reject your reality"
Zoe: Preacher, don't the Bible have some pretty specific things to say about killing? Book: Quite specific. It is, however, somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.
'War Stories'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Laga - Jun 15, 2007 7:41:57 pm PDT #9701 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
esse - Jun 15, 2007 11:28:02 pm PDT #9702 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
oh, perfect!
DXMachina - Jun 16, 2007 1:48:51 am PDT #9703 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Are we going to create a new thread, or reopen the experimental thread under a new name? Also, are there any changes to the thread slug and header, apart from removing the "experimental" verbiage? Right now it's:
Slug:
Thread for discussion of non-fiction television, including documentaries and reality shows. [NAFDA]
Header:
This thread is for non-fiction tv, including but not limited to documentaries and reality shows. [NAFDA]
Kristen - Jun 16, 2007 1:59:37 am PDT #9704 of 10001
Personally, I would prefer that we simply reopen the old thread with a new name. I'm not sure how anyone else feels about that.
esse - Jun 16, 2007 2:01:09 am PDT #9705 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
It's the creation of a new thread, not a re-opening of an old thread. Experimental stays experimental; this is a brand-spakin'-new Nonfic thread.
I'd like to incorporate the wording from the proposal for the header, because I think it touches on the kinds of television and examples of that kind of television. And I'd like something clever-er for the slug, really.
ETA: The proposal I put forth was a new thread, not an extension of experimental. I think it's important that the experimentals exist as they currently do, to reference the data Cindy was looking for.
Topic!Cindy - Jun 16, 2007 5:43:36 am PDT #9706 of 10001
What is even happening?
I don't care, either way. If it were a thread in which I'd been active, because the subject matter is exactly the same, I would prefer naming and re-slugging the experimental, just so the conversation could continue easily, but I don't think it's a big deal. It seems to me it should be SA's call. It was her proposal.
le nubian - Jun 16, 2007 6:10:57 am PDT #9707 of 10001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
I vote for renaming and reopen. We had conversations in there and I would like the conversation to keep going. It's all here what the history of the thread is.
I *love* the proposed new title.
Note: if someone feels REALLY strongly that it should be a new thread, I wouldn't fight it.
Matt the Bruins fan - Jun 16, 2007 6:42:50 am PDT #9708 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Couldn't we put a Natter-esque "Discussion continues here" link at the end of the closed thread, and reference it with a link in the slug of the new one so anyone interested in the prior conversations can go back easily?
Topic!Cindy - Jun 16, 2007 6:48:46 am PDT #9709 of 10001
What is even happening?
That's a good idea, Matt.
esse - Jun 16, 2007 6:55:03 am PDT #9710 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
Couldn't we put a Natter-esque "Discussion continues here" link at the end of the closed thread, and reference it with a link in the slug of the new one so anyone interested in the prior conversations can go back easily?
Fine with me.