ita makes a good point. I no longer have a favorite.
Willow ,'Storyteller'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Right now, there are about 50 posts left.
My bad, I meant to say that I am hundreds of posts behind.
This is my first pick:
Natter 52: We Have No Deck. We Have a Three.
and this is my second:
Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?
even though I'm with Laura, nearly 300 posts behind. Actually, I don't even consider myself behind until I get over 300. I think that may say something about me, but I'm not sure what.
Full Deck? Gets my vote.
I am down with the full deck.
I like "Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?"
I'm liking "Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?". Just in case anyone was wondering, "Hm, what does JenP think? Has she changed her mind?" No, she has not. She has just added her liking of the adding of the question mark.
I still like the three, but I will be mollified by "..full deck?" with appropriate punct-- uation.
I'm liking "Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?". Just in case anyone was wondering, "Hm, what does JenP think? Has she changed her mind?" No, she has not. She has just added her liking of the adding of the question mark.
t loves JenP
Natter 52: We Have No Deck. We Have a Three.
This would get my vote. I like it when we refer back to Buffy, and thus our origins.
Though I certainly don't mind Playing with a Full Deck? if that's the one we end up with.