Simon: You're out of your mind. Early: That's between me and my mind.

'Objects In Space'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


§ ita § - May 17, 2007 4:02:09 pm PDT #9224 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't think I've seen a single show dominate a thread the way Heroes sometimes "took over" Boxed Set.

Heh. There's also Eureka. And when SG? isn't sucking and hasn't been torrented by some...lots of traffic. BSG got lots of traffic too. I didn't count those, just Eureka, and it matched or exceeded Heroes.

It's a perception thing, with recency dominant.


Jon B. - May 17, 2007 4:14:38 pm PDT #9225 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

It's a perception thing, with recency dominant.

Totally. Because for me? It's SPN that's dominated that thread since even before Heroes spun off.


libkitty - May 17, 2007 4:24:04 pm PDT #9226 of 10001
Embrace the idea that we are the leaders we've been looking for. Grace Lee Boggs

Personally, I like the experimental threads the way they are. I'm mostly in drama, and I don't find any one show dominating, nor do I really see any show with enough conversation to really keep a thread going. I'd rather not have white font, but don't care enough to push strongly on that front, especially since I, too, have noticed people missing that I would otherwise expect to see.

I haven't spent much time in the other experimentals, so I don't have a good feel for how they're working, but I love the effect on Natter and Bitches. I can sort of, kind of keep up now. And even when I'm behind, I like having a better feel for whether to skip or slog.

Or, in short: Yeah Experimentals! Go Experimentals! Or rather, Stay Experimentals!


§ ita § - May 17, 2007 4:29:16 pm PDT #9227 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

And I dislike the experimentals because the TV discussion where I wouldn't get spoiled has dwindled down to nothing. So I have less TV to talk about.


Polter-Cow - May 17, 2007 5:03:32 pm PDT #9228 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I just wanted to clarify that of course I know about SPN. I was referring to the experimental threads only.


Kat - May 17, 2007 5:09:20 pm PDT #9229 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

ita is me. I am pretty spoiler averse and the one show I want to discuss, even though I'm time shifted, I actually can't discuss. And of the two times I brought it up in Natter, I was gently reminded that they were talking about it in another thread, so take it there.


SailAweigh - May 17, 2007 5:12:23 pm PDT #9230 of 10001
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I, too, love the experimental threads. At least, the ones I frequent: Network Drama and Non-fiction. They work well for me because I don't have to skim over Natterinos chatting a million miles a second. I'm fortunate in being on the coast that gets shows first and don't have to skim over other folks squeeing. I can see instituting a 24 hour whitefont so that West Coasters and time delay watchers can have a bit of a breather to get caught up.


JenP - May 17, 2007 5:16:19 pm PDT #9231 of 10001

And of the two times I brought it up in Natter, I was gently reminded that they were talking about it in another thread, so take it there.

Heh. Guess I shouldn't have just asked a CSI quesiton in Natter then, huh? Oh, well. But I thought we weren't going to try to shoo TV talk out of Natter, even with the Experimental threads. Maybe I'm just imagining discussion. I do that from time to time.


Kat - May 17, 2007 5:26:48 pm PDT #9232 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Nope, Jen, that's what I thought too. But it happens anyway (the shooing, I mean).

eta In reality, it doesn't matter if the thread serves my tv viewing needs. I don't really need to discuss tv and my inability to do so in natter does not diminish my enjoyment of natter nor of the show. So I guess if it serves everyone else's needs, more power to you all.


brenda m - May 17, 2007 5:33:45 pm PDT #9233 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

And of the two times I brought it up in Natter, I was gently reminded that they were talking about it in another thread, so take it there.

Were you? I've seen some TV talk in Natter and was glad to see it. If we do keep one or more of the threads, or develop new ones, I'd like Natter to still be a free-for-all zone. Which isn't to say that Natterers shouldn't point people who might not know to the other areas just so they know where to find more discussion.

I subbed to all four at first. Dropped one, and then another - one I kind of expected to, the other I didn't. It just wasn't doing it for me, quite. But I was still glad to have somewhere to go for the occasional post. The two I've kept, I really like, and I'd hate to lose.

That said, I don't see any shows in those (for me, it's Network Drama and Non-fiction) that I think could sustain their own thread. Yet. But I very much like the threads as they stand.

The whitefont question could stand to be revisited, I guess. I'm fine how they are, but I'd be happy to open the discussion again if others aren't.

(That said, it does seem like the most whitefonty of the four is lagging in comparison. But I haven't followed the discussion within enough to know if it's an issue or not.)