Seconding, if that's still needed.
I miss Oz. He'd get it. He wouldn't say anything, but he'd get it.
Xander ,'Get It Done'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
-t - Apr 10, 2007 1:40:36 pm PDT #9036 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Topic!Cindy - Apr 10, 2007 1:53:32 pm PDT #9037 of 10001
What is even happening?
Sean K - Apr 10, 2007 2:02:04 pm PDT #9038 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Just to clarify for Jessica (and anyone else), I didn't mean "faux democracy" to be derogatory, or that our democratic process is bullshit. I just meant it as.... I'm not sure I know how to put this.... I guess, "our little version of democracy." That's all.
billytea - Apr 10, 2007 2:10:04 pm PDT #9039 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Faux democracy? How is counting votes and going with what the majority wants "faux" democratic in any way?
Well, there's no preferential voting...
NoiseDesign - Apr 10, 2007 2:42:57 pm PDT #9040 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
I think ND was serious with this proposal:
Yes, I actually was. Sorry, I had to teach a class and just got back here.
esse - Apr 10, 2007 3:06:57 pm PDT #9041 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
I'm sorry, Drew, I can't second that proposal because I don't think it does anything overall for bolstering thread discussion. If it was one or the other, I'd probably consider it, or if you were proposing a more wider-range of shows around a theme. But I don't see the point of a two-show thread with no major ties, as opposed to Joss or Tim show threads, or some kind of qualification like gritty original dramas, or procedurals.
Jesse - Apr 10, 2007 3:13:06 pm PDT #9042 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Aren't we supposed to be discussing Cindy's proposal in Lightbulbs, anyway?
esse - Apr 10, 2007 3:16:07 pm PDT #9043 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
I think we were waiting for a stompy to officially open it. (Except for me, as I will be going to sleep now. How did it get to be past 1 am?)
NoiseDesign - Apr 10, 2007 3:22:38 pm PDT #9044 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
If that's the case then I'd happily propose a Bones or a Numbers thread. I'm just going with the shows that I actually watch. I'd love a bucket thread of the shows I'm watching.
-t - Apr 10, 2007 3:23:40 pm PDT #9045 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Noise, I would second your proposal if I hadn't just seconded Cindy's, and most of why I am going all seconding happy is because I want focussed discussion. If you still want to propose your thread after this discussion, is done, please do propose again!
Eta: I'm very sorry, but I have been extremely confused by this while discussion and haven't been able to understand what any one person was stating or proposing or speculating on for some time. I don't want to marginalize your proposal at all.