If we're still talking about this, and not going for the vote yet, I'd like a definition of "splintering the community". No, seriously. There are people who post in Natter but not Bitches, and vice versa, there are people who post in only one forum, people who avoid certain threads like Boxed Set. I'd never have met deb grabien if I hadn't joined Great Write on a whim. I've been hanging here for years and I read practically every post in Natter, Bitches, Boxed Set, and Minearverse, and there are surely people on this board I've never met or rarely see. If the community is everyone who posts on the Phoenix Board, we're already splintered. Seems like what we're trying to do is create "safer spaces" for people to un-splinter, to come back together in conversation. Obviously people should post where they please, but if people are avoiding threads that contain conversations they're interested in, that sounds like splintering to me. I'd love to talk Dresden Files with more people, but they're avoiding Boxed Set because of BSG or Dr. Who or whatever. If the creation of more threads allows more people to join in conversations they've been missing and wanting, that's bringing people together, not splintering.
And while cross-pollination is surely a good thing, the opposite also exists: I've lost interest in watching BSG and Supernatural because I feel drowned in them. Not to say those who love them shouldn't squee in my space! I'm not trying to harsh anyone's joy, at all. I'm just the opposite of people who avoid the conversation because of spoilers; I risk the spoilers; but being spoiled and being inundated are different, somehow. And I did notice that there was more talk about Dresden Files and Blood Ties this week, when BSG didn't come on right after.
The post I wrote at work was better. Sorry.
I like discovery threads that are clearly marked as temporary.
And, um, this.