Willow, check you out! Witch-Fu!

Buffy ,'Lessons'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Topic!Cindy - Apr 10, 2007 11:02:29 am PDT #8993 of 10001
What is even happening?

I really can't see one huge general drama thread working. That just becomes tv natter and I'd rather just keep it in natter at that point.

I can't, either -- not in the long run. What I was proposing was step one, to see what shows generate good discussion. Once we had that data, would could go from there to see what shows deserved their own threads/if any shows would work better in a bucket with other shows/if we should make no change.

It's either a really horrible idea, or I'm articulating it horribly, or nobody is getting the distinction I'm making.


NoiseDesign - Apr 10, 2007 11:06:38 am PDT #8994 of 10001
Our wings are not tired

Okay then I propose a tiny bucket thread for Numbers and Bones.

I would also propose a thread for BSG but that will wait until it is airing again.


brenda m - Apr 10, 2007 11:11:02 am PDT #8995 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Jess, in fairness most of the people who've given that opinion have actually listed shows they'd like to see threads of.

Not until a couple of posts ago - and thanks for chiming in with that ND. I would be behind BSG but need to be convinced on the other.


Steph L. - Apr 10, 2007 11:24:37 am PDT #8996 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

nobody is getting the distinction I'm making.

I get it, a lot, but I think I'm posting in freaking whitefont this week.


Jesse - Apr 10, 2007 11:34:26 am PDT #8997 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Did Heros spin off (as a thread) from Boxed Set? If so, I like that as a model, and I think it's what Cindy is talking about promoting in the future.

In the meantime, I'd be more than happy to see someone with an actual proposal on the table, because it's easier to go yay or nay on something specific than a general theory.

And I don't think we need to pick either/or single shows or buckets -- I mean, we have both now, and we're not dead yet, right?


Hayden - Apr 10, 2007 11:35:26 am PDT #8998 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

It's either a really horrible idea, or I'm articulating it horribly, or nobody is getting the distinction I'm making.

I get it, too. Pilot projects sometimes use more of a scattershot approach before honing their scope for the permanent phase.


Ailleann - Apr 10, 2007 11:38:29 am PDT #8999 of 10001
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda

it's easier to go yay or nay on something specific than a general theory

I agree with this. Perhaps we could start suggesting various ideas of threads and see what happens with the consensus?

Was there ever an answer to the technical question about thread proliferation? I've been wondering about that.


brenda m - Apr 10, 2007 11:39:52 am PDT #9000 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

What I was proposing was step one, to see what shows generate good discussion. Once we had that data, would could go from there to see what shows deserved their own threads/if any shows would work better in a bucket with other shows/if we should make no change.

If that's a proposal, I'll second.


esse - Apr 10, 2007 11:42:14 am PDT #9001 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I can't, either -- not in the long run. What I was proposing was step one, to see what shows generate good discussion. Once we had that data, would could go from there to see what shows deserved their own threads/if any shows would work better in a bucket with other shows/if we should make no change.

Cindy, I do see what you're saying. The problem that I have with a general drama thread is that I don't see it serving the needs of the community very well, overall or as a determining point for future threads. Largely, because I think we will spend the rest of April figuring out how to use it, and then only a handful of shows might get higher posting volumes than others; and then, maybe we'll create single show threads, or a couple of bucket threads based on whatever discussion takes place there. But I don't see it as a good determination of what we want to talk about because I think it's limiting in its grandness. I really do think we need to tread down the more difficult road of the golilocks thread. I think it will result in threads better suited to us overall than whatever data we receive from a general drama thread--because I think drama is way too broad.

Did Heros spin off (as a thread) from Boxed Set? If so, I like that as a model, and I think it's what Cindy is talking about promoting in the future.

It did. But the difference I see there is that Boxed Set has been around for a long while and has already established itself as a place where we can determine, roughly, what shows would work on their own by post count. Whereas a drama thread is too broad, with too many shows that could possibly go in there, and with not enough focus to actually give us good data.


esse - Apr 10, 2007 11:43:15 am PDT #9002 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I agree with this. Perhaps we could start suggesting various ideas of threads and see what happens with the consensus?

I did that up-thread. But it seems to have blipped, mostly.