.
Xander ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Someone has been posting in his name, and when called on it, says, "I'm not the guy who doesn't tell the truth."
Right; he said "I've been posting under his name just because Gus really wanted to keep the TV tropes thing going." The implication being that, without his name attached to it, all interest in the wiki would fade, I guess.
But that's a flimsy and lame excuse for posting in someone's name, and, frankly, sounds like a load of crap to me.
I'm really not sure why.
For my part, it's because there's enough reasonable doubt about everything else, I find myself doubting the veracity of the death claim.
I've had several very close friends IRL die on me, and I take it seriously. If this Gus person has in fact died, despite the fact that he's fabricated some elements of his life*, I want to know so I can mourn.
If he's not dead, I have a bajillion better things to do with that emotional energy.
None of that is to mention the fact that there was some talk of a donation, which, while still generous, if done under false pretenses would make me very upset, and wanting my money back.
(*Gus almost certainly was not a PhD. Nilly shows up on Google Scholar. Papers my dad, who is a PhD, published long before the Internet was commonplace, show up on Google. If Gus was a PhD, he had to publish. He would show up somewhere on the Internet.)
I don't know if it would be at all helpful, but I can post a link to the Penlind story. Unsure if my publisher would have a fit, but I think it's a small enough group that it wouldn't be much more than my beta-reader list.
Right; he said "I've been posting under his name just because Gus really wanted to keep the TV tropes thing going."
Do we know it was a 'he'? I was assuming it was ostensibly Gus's GF.
When does your book hit the shelves, Allyson?
Do we know it was a 'he'?
We don't, and you're right. I was just falling into the default-to-"he" trap.
August.
.
None of that is to mention the fact that there was some talk of a donation, which, while still generous, if done under false pretenses would make me very upset, and wanting my money back.
Understood, but I just want it clear that neither Gus nor his family requested a donation. It was brought up by Buffistas, an historically generous bunch. While I find a lot of the story fishy, I don't want any misconceptions that Gus and/or his family was out for money.