Mal: So we run. Nandi: I understand, Captain Reynolds. You have your people to think of, same as me. And this ain't your fight. Mal: Don't believe you do understand, Nandi. I said 'we run'. We.

'Heart Of Gold'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


tommyrot - Jan 02, 2007 5:34:39 pm PST #7824 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I think that's only for the certified certificate and you need to be related to request that one.

I had to go back and check, but it looks like that's not the case.

In response to customer requests, the Wisconsin Vital Records Office can now expedite in-person requests for both certified and uncertified copies of death certificates for an additional fee.

eta: It doesn't say for the fax ones, but it says all fax requests pay the expedited rate, so I'm assuming it would be similar to expedited, uncertified in-person...

Gawd, my head is about to explode....


Aims - Jan 02, 2007 5:42:52 pm PST #7825 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Kristin, I can ask B to do a search in the next day or two. Provided she doesn't pop.


Liese S. - Jan 02, 2007 5:43:28 pm PST #7826 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

he did interact with brenda and ... someone else I'm forgetting

Well, for the record, there was me. Gus did business with my company as well. However, he donated the labor, so there was no receipting process. All my company's correspondence with him happened electronically as well. (Which is not unusual for us, I should add.) So I have nothing helpful as far as documentation goes. I appreciated the expertise of a generous man.

I don't post my picture online, have in the past flaked out of planned meet-ups, post under multiple pseudonyms and email addresses throughout the web, decline to tell you my real name and address, and if you managed to find my unlisted phone numbers would discover that one was a New Mexico number and one was an Indianapolis number, neither of which are where I (claim to) live. I have deliberately avoided being visible on the web and am not, with the exception of my company. I am shy and have not met most of you and have never called any of you. Well, okay, except Steph, 'cause I needed directions to Graeters. Very important. I did meet some of you and some of you do know my name and company and where my house is. But I find lots of what we have under discussion here still falls under plausible deniability for me. There's also lots that remains inexplicable and problematic.

If I were a family member and read this conversation, would I be upset by reading that someone hopes my loved one is dead so that he doesn't turn out to be a liar? Yeah.

(eta: I feel this way, too, and said so privately early on. I don't mean to feel this way is wrong, just that I might react poorly upon seeing it if I were a legitimately grieving family member.)

Was I a friend who was upset upon hearing about his death, upset at seeing the mourning of my friends, and more upset by the possibility of deception? Yeah.

Where does that leave me? I'm not too sure, other than I am sorry we have suffered a loss as a community, one way or another. I'm sorry we've been hurt, one way or another. I hope we continue to communicate with each other and relate to each other regardless.


Nutty - Jan 02, 2007 6:11:30 pm PST #7827 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Thanks for weighing in, Liese. (I have to admit, I never feel older than when I realize how much of my life is googleable.) Definitely agree that the monkey-grooming should be, and has mostly been, set on High.

(Anybody who has YouTube footage of a monkey and a hair-dryer, now is your moment!! )


Steph L. - Jan 02, 2007 6:17:23 pm PST #7828 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Well, there is Trunk Monkey.


Sue - Jan 02, 2007 6:23:58 pm PST #7829 of 10001
hip deep in pie

What about a Monkey bathing a cat:

[link]


deborah grabien - Jan 02, 2007 7:14:04 pm PST #7830 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Sorry if this is way late, but I was pointed to this:

For the record, I did not check with deb, to see if she ever finally got it. Those comments by me were based only on what I saw in thread. Deb doesn't come here much any more, and I didn't want to drag her into something, so for all I know, she got a synopsis. I just never saw it in GWW.

No synopsis. He never sent it. Claimed he had, but it never got to my email. I wondered about it then, but frankly, my own suspicions had nothing to do with whether or not he was "real"; I find I don't much care, since whoever or whatever he was, he was funny and sharp-edged in the only place I was still posting at b.org in the past year.

I wondered if he'd remembered that I don't read much scifi or fantasy, and was afraid I'd roll my eyes at it. Which is silly - I wouldn't have, not to him, not to anyone.

I have no clue if this one of these cases Allyson writes about in her book - that was the Penlind person, yes? I have trouble believing it, just because the mind boggles. Who in HELL has time to stage something that whack?

Anyway. Hoping everyone's having a good new years.


Cass - Jan 02, 2007 7:41:51 pm PST #7831 of 10001
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

I don't post my picture online, have in the past flaked out of planned meet-ups, post under multiple pseudonyms and email addresses throughout the web, decline to tell you my real name and address, and if you managed to find my unlisted phone numbers would discover that one was a New Mexico number and one was an Indianapolis number, neither of which are where I (claim to) live. I have deliberately avoided being visible on the web and am not, with the exception of my company. I am shy and have not met most of you and have never called any of you. Well, okay, except Steph, 'cause I needed directions to Graeters. Very important. I did meet some of you and some of you do know my name and company and where my house is. But I find lots of what we have under discussion here still falls under plausible deniability for me. There's also lots that remains inexplicable and problematic.
Thank you for posting this, Liese. Good to remember that we are all only giving what we chose to here and online.

I hope we continue to communicate with each other and relate to each other regardless.
We are all optimistic on that point, I think. I mean, I really hope we do, but the past couple of days have been ugly on a lot of sides.

--
It's sad. There was definitely a poster named Gus. He posted. Many of us interacted. Now maybe the things he said about himself were true and maybe they weren't. Many people are focusing on this because they want something verifiable about his life and death. I - personally, very personally - don't give a damn about whether he lied about his life. But I do care about whether or not the person posting, that I had an online posting relationship with, is really dead or not. And finding that out? Requires finding things out. It's viciously circular.


Pix - Jan 02, 2007 7:42:43 pm PST #7832 of 10001
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie

I do care about whether or not the person posting, that I had an online posting relationship with, is really dead or not. And finding that out? Requires finding things out. It's viciously circular.

This, precisely.


bon bon - Jan 02, 2007 7:43:07 pm PST #7833 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Liese, am I crazy, or were you at the first F2F? Didn't you have some magic cord action in Chicago or am I thinking of someone else?